ECAT vs. NXG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT) and NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund (NXG).

ECAT is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Sep 28, 2021. NXG is an actively managed fund by NXG. It was launched on Sep 28, 2012.

Performance

ECAT vs. NXG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT) and NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund (NXG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ECAT vs. NXG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ECAT BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust	-6.71%	16.64%	19.96%	32.36%	0.16%
NXG NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund	12.14%	28.75%	51.16%	4.54%	-5.68%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECAT achieves a -6.71% return, which is significantly lower than NXG's 12.14% return.

ECAT

• 1D: 1.49%
• 1M: -8.56%
• YTD: -6.71%
• 6M: -7.80%
• 1Y: 7.03%
• 3Y*: 13.21%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NXG

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 2.43%
• YTD: 12.14%
• 6M: 20.04%
• 1Y: 35.95%
• 3Y*: 32.68%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECAT vs. NXG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ECAT has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than NXG's 1.00% expense ratio.

ECAT

BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust

NXG

NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund

Return for Risk

ECAT vs. NXG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECAT

ECAT Risk / Return Rank: 16
ECAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
ECAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
ECAT Omega Ratio Rank: 16
ECAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
ECAT Martin Ratio Rank: 17

NXG

NXG Risk / Return Rank: 73
NXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
NXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
NXG Omega Ratio Rank: 78
NXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
NXG Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECAT vs. NXG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT) and NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund (NXG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ECAT	NXG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.42	1.41	-0.99
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.68	1.79	-1.11
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.30	-0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.47	1.67	-1.20
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.75	6.02	-4.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ECAT vs. NXG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECAT Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the NXG Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECAT and NXG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ECAT	NXG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42	1.41	-0.99
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	0.94	-0.63

Correlation

The correlation between ECAT and NXG is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ECAT vs. NXG - Dividend Comparison

ECAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.39%, more than NXG's 11.71% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ECAT BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust	25.39%	23.00%	17.44%	9.14%	8.94%	0.54%
NXG NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund	11.71%	12.67%	14.15%	12.00%	1.11%	0.00%

Drawdowns

ECAT vs. NXG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECAT drawdown since its inception was -32.23%, which is greater than NXG's maximum drawdown of -26.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECAT and NXG.

Drawdown Indicators

	ECAT	NXG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.23%	-26.14%	-6.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.90%	-20.94%	+8.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.48%	-2.83%	-7.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.41%	-6.77%	-2.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.49%	5.80%	-2.31%

Volatility

ECAT vs. NXG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT) is 5.97%, while NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund (NXG) has a volatility of 7.47%. This indicates that ECAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NXG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ECAT	NXG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.97%	7.47%	-1.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.34%	11.97%	-1.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.97%	25.72%	-8.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.95%	26.91%	-9.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.95%	26.91%	-9.96%