EBSIX vs. GPAIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class I Shares (EBSIX) and Grant Park Multi Alternative Strategies Fund (GPAIX).
EBSIX is managed by Campbell & Company. It was launched on Mar 4, 2013. GPAIX is managed by Grant Park. It was launched on Dec 30, 2013.
Performance
EBSIX vs. GPAIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EBSIX vs. GPAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBSIX Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class I Shares | 7.05% | -1.14% | 11.63% | -1.83% | 30.91% | 9.05% | 4.94% |
GPAIX Grant Park Multi Alternative Strategies Fund | 2.54% | 12.24% | 1.33% | 4.02% | -1.88% | 5.70% | 5.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EBSIX achieves a 7.05% return, which is significantly higher than GPAIX's 2.54% return.
EBSIX
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- 7.05%
- 6M
- 3.19%
- 1Y
- 0.38%
- 3Y*
- 3.75%
- 5Y*
- 9.32%
- 10Y*
- —
GPAIX
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -3.94%
- YTD
- 2.54%
- 6M
- 4.46%
- 1Y
- 13.37%
- 3Y*
- 6.99%
- 5Y*
- 4.21%
- 10Y*
- 4.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EBSIX vs. GPAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EBSIX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GPAIX's 1.43% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EBSIX vs. GPAIX — Risk / Return Rank
EBSIX
GPAIX
EBSIX vs. GPAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class I Shares (EBSIX) and Grant Park Multi Alternative Strategies Fund (GPAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EBSIX | GPAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.05 | 1.61 | -1.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.12 | 2.17 | -2.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.29 | -0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.14 | 2.26 | -2.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.25 | 7.57 | -7.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EBSIX | GPAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 | 1.61 | -1.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 0.66 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.13 | 0.69 | +0.44 |
Correlation
The correlation between EBSIX and GPAIX is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EBSIX vs. GPAIX - Dividend Comparison
EBSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, less than GPAIX's 3.36% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBSIX Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class I Shares | 2.95% | 3.16% | 2.90% | 1.82% | 15.10% | 7.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GPAIX Grant Park Multi Alternative Strategies Fund | 3.36% | 3.44% | 2.01% | 1.98% | 2.71% | 10.90% | 1.78% | 13.29% | 1.51% | 1.68% | 1.92% | 1.49% |
Drawdowns
EBSIX vs. GPAIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EBSIX drawdown since its inception was -10.96%, smaller than the maximum GPAIX drawdown of -17.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBSIX and GPAIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EBSIX | GPAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.96% | -17.16% | +6.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.43% | -6.01% | -1.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.96% | -9.13% | -1.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.69% | -5.04% | +4.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.13% | -4.22% | +1.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.37% | 1.79% | +2.58% |
Volatility
EBSIX vs. GPAIX - Volatility Comparison
Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class I Shares (EBSIX) has a higher volatility of 3.12% compared to Grant Park Multi Alternative Strategies Fund (GPAIX) at 2.59%. This indicates that EBSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EBSIX | GPAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | 2.59% | +0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.23% | 6.86% | -0.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.51% | 8.57% | -0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.59% | 6.46% | +3.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.52% | 7.21% | +2.31% |