PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EBLU vs. TBLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EBLU vs. TBLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ecofin Global Water ESG Fund (EBLU) and Tortoise Global Water Fund (TBLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EBLU vs. TBLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EBLU
Ecofin Global Water ESG Fund
0.43%11.82%8.54%20.95%-25.99%28.93%15.74%38.72%-12.80%20.21%
TBLU
Tortoise Global Water Fund
0.43%11.82%8.54%20.95%-25.99%28.93%15.74%38.72%-12.80%20.21%

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with EBLU at 0.43% and TBLU at 0.43%.


EBLU

1D
1.19%
1M
-8.21%
YTD
0.43%
6M
-1.42%
1Y
11.49%
3Y*
11.06%
5Y*
5.76%
10Y*

TBLU

1D
1.19%
1M
-8.21%
YTD
0.43%
6M
-1.42%
1Y
11.49%
3Y*
11.06%
5Y*
5.76%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EBLU vs. TBLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EBLU and TBLU have an expense ratio of 0.40%.


Return for Risk

EBLU vs. TBLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EBLU
EBLU Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
EBLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EBLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
EBLU Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
EBLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
EBLU Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

TBLU
TBLU Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
TBLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBLU Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
TBLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBLU Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EBLU vs. TBLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ecofin Global Water ESG Fund (EBLU) and Tortoise Global Water Fund (TBLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EBLUTBLUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.67

0.67

0.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.10

1.10

0.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.14

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

0.86

0.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.79

2.79

0.00

EBLU vs. TBLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EBLU Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is comparable to the TBLU Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EBLU and TBLU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EBLUTBLUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

0.67

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.34

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.52

0.00

Correlation

The correlation between EBLU and TBLU is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

EBLU vs. TBLU - Dividend Comparison

EBLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, which matches TBLU's 3.29% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EBLU
Ecofin Global Water ESG Fund
3.29%3.31%1.34%1.46%1.64%1.55%1.42%1.58%1.35%1.32%
TBLU
Tortoise Global Water Fund
3.29%3.31%1.34%1.46%1.64%1.55%1.42%1.58%1.35%1.32%

Drawdowns

EBLU vs. TBLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBLU drawdown since its inception was -37.58%, roughly equal to the maximum TBLU drawdown of -37.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBLU and TBLU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EBLUTBLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.58%

-37.58%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.17%

-13.17%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.36%

-35.36%

0.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.47%

-9.47%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.13%

-8.13%

0.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.07%

4.07%

0.00%

Volatility

EBLU vs. TBLU - Volatility Comparison

Ecofin Global Water ESG Fund (EBLU) and Tortoise Global Water Fund (TBLU) have volatilities of 5.83% and 5.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EBLUTBLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.83%

5.83%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.60%

10.60%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.19%

17.19%

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.20%

17.20%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.00%

19.00%

0.00%