EBLU vs. WTTR

In the year-to-date period, EBLU achieves a 6.21% return, which is significantly higher than WTTR's -34.07% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ecofin Global Water ESG Fund (EBLU) and Select Energy Services, Inc. (WTTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current EBLU Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is higher than the WTTR Sharpe Ratio of -0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EBLU and WTTR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

EBLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than WTTR's 3.14% yield.

The maximum EBLU drawdown since its inception was -37.58%, smaller than the maximum WTTR drawdown of -89.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBLU and WTTR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Ecofin Global Water ESG Fund (EBLU) is 6.04%, while Select Energy Services, Inc. (WTTR) has a volatility of 19.24%. This indicates that EBLU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WTTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.