PortfoliosLab logo
EBLU vs. XLE
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between EBLU and XLE is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

EBLU vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ecofin Global Water ESG Fund (EBLU) and Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

EBLU:

21.11%

XLE:

25.12%

Max Drawdown

EBLU:

-1.46%

XLE:

-71.54%

Current Drawdown

EBLU:

-0.22%

XLE:

-13.88%

Returns By Period


EBLU

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

XLE

YTD

-3.02%

1M

4.49%

6M

-10.65%

1Y

-9.26%

5Y*

22.13%

10Y*

4.30%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EBLU vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EBLU has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.13% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

EBLU vs. XLE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EBLU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EBLU is 4444
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EBLU is 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EBLU is 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EBLU is 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EBLU is 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EBLU is 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

XLE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XLE is 66
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XLE is 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XLE is 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XLE is 88
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XLE is 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XLE is 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EBLU vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ecofin Global Water ESG Fund (EBLU) and Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

EBLU vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

EBLU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EBLU
Ecofin Global Water ESG Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLE
Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund
3.47%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%5.73%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%2.35%

Drawdowns

EBLU vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBLU drawdown since its inception was -1.46%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBLU and XLE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

EBLU vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...