PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EBLU vs. OILK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EBLU vs. OILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ecofin Global Water ESG Fund (EBLU) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EBLU achieves a -1.99% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.


EBLU

1D
0.17%
1M
-3.28%
YTD
-1.99%
6M
-4.11%
1Y
-1.51%
3Y*
9.71%
5Y*
3.78%
10Y*

OILK

1D
1.40%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
64.22%
6M
60.70%
1Y
58.99%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
17.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EBLU vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EBLU
Ecofin Global Water ESG Fund
-1.99%11.82%8.54%20.95%-25.99%28.93%15.74%38.72%-12.80%20.21%
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
64.22%-11.86%8.18%-0.97%27.57%63.71%-61.09%30.48%-20.40%6.57%

Correlation

The correlation between EBLU and OILK is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2017

0.13

The correlation between EBLU and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.35 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EBLU vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EBLU
OILK

Industrials

70.6%

-

Utilities

20.1%

-

Technology

4.0%

-

Basic Materials

4.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.4%

-

Energy

1.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.2%
100.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

EBLU
70.6%
OILK

-

Utilities

EBLU
20.1%
OILK

-

Technology

EBLU
4.0%
OILK

-

Basic Materials

EBLU
4.0%
OILK

-

Consumer Defensive

EBLU
3.4%
OILK

-

Energy

EBLU
1.1%
OILK

-

Consumer Cyclical

EBLU
0.2%
OILK
100.0%

Communication Services

EBLU

-

OILK

-

Financial Services

EBLU

-

OILK

-

Healthcare

EBLU

-

OILK

-

Real Estate

EBLU

-

OILK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EBLU vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EBLU
EBLU Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
EBLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EBLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
EBLU Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
EBLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
EBLU Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

OILK
OILK Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EBLU vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ecofin Global Water ESG Fund (EBLU) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EBLUOILKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.11

2.06

-2.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.05

2.59

-2.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.34

-0.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.12

3.42

-3.53

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.28

6.91

-7.19

EBLU vs. OILK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EBLU Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the OILK Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EBLU and OILK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EBLUOILKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

2.06

-2.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.59

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.12

+0.38

Drawdowns

EBLU vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBLU drawdown since its inception was -37.58%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBLU and OILK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EBLUOILKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.58%

-83.76%

+46.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.17%

-17.35%

+4.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.42%

-23.42%

+8.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.36%

-34.69%

-0.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.65%

-3.66%

-7.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.15%

-32.61%

+24.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.46%

8.56%

-3.10%

Volatility

EBLU vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ecofin Global Water ESG Fund (EBLU) is 4.35%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that EBLU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EBLUOILKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.35%

10.44%

-6.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.46%

23.26%

-11.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.44%

28.75%

-14.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.32%

30.12%

-12.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.96%

35.97%

-17.01%

EBLU vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

EBLU has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

EBLU vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison

EBLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EBLU
Ecofin Global Water ESG Fund
3.37%3.31%1.34%1.46%1.64%1.55%1.42%1.58%1.35%1.32%
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
8.18%4.79%3.11%5.80%17.32%68.82%0.13%0.94%0.58%6.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


EBLU and OILK have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to EBLU (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EBLU dropped -37.58% vs OILK's -83.76%.

On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 17.73% vs 3.78% for EBLU. On fees, EBLU is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, EBLU has been the lower-risk option at 4.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.73% return vs 3.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EBLU is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.

OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 3.37% for EBLU.

EBLU is categorized as Water Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. EBLU tracks Ecofin Water ESG Index, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: Tortoise and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for EBLU and 0.68% for OILK.

OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EBLU and OILK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer