PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EBIZ vs. XYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EBIZ vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X E-commerce ETF (EBIZ) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EBIZ achieves a -15.29% return, which is significantly lower than XYLD's 4.96% return.


EBIZ

1D
-2.05%
1M
-2.71%
YTD
-15.29%
6M
-15.50%
1Y
-8.74%
3Y*
17.16%
5Y*
-3.65%
10Y*

XYLD

1D
-0.15%
1M
2.00%
YTD
4.96%
6M
6.48%
1Y
17.66%
3Y*
11.27%
5Y*
7.72%
10Y*
8.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EBIZ vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EBIZ
Global X E-commerce ETF
-15.29%17.74%31.26%30.88%-40.96%-13.26%74.39%32.76%-11.01%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
4.96%8.02%19.49%11.10%-12.05%19.59%-0.56%21.41%-9.21%

Correlation

The correlation between EBIZ and XYLD is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2018

0.61

The correlation between EBIZ and XYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

EBIZ vs. XYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EBIZ
XYLD

Consumer Cyclical

75.6%
10.2%

Technology

13.2%
35.6%

Industrials

4.6%
8.3%

Real Estate

2.6%
1.9%

Healthcare

2.1%
8.5%

Communication Services

1.6%
11.2%

Financial Services

0.3%
11.8%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Energy

-

3.5%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

EBIZ
75.6%
XYLD
10.2%

Technology

EBIZ
13.2%
XYLD
35.6%

Industrials

EBIZ
4.6%
XYLD
8.3%

Real Estate

EBIZ
2.6%
XYLD
1.9%

Healthcare

EBIZ
2.1%
XYLD
8.5%

Communication Services

EBIZ
1.6%
XYLD
11.2%

Financial Services

EBIZ
0.3%
XYLD
11.8%

Basic Materials

EBIZ

-

XYLD
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

EBIZ

-

XYLD
4.9%

Energy

EBIZ

-

XYLD
3.5%

Utilities

EBIZ

-

XYLD
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EBIZ vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EBIZ
EBIZ Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
EBIZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EBIZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
EBIZ Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
EBIZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
EBIZ Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

XYLD
XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EBIZ vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X E-commerce ETF (EBIZ) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EBIZXYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.64

-0.70

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.32

3.35

-3.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.65

17.84

-18.50

EBIZ vs. XYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EBIZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.44, which is lower than the XYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EBIZ and XYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EBIZXYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.44

2.71

-3.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

0.69

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.60

-0.32

Drawdowns

EBIZ vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBIZ drawdown since its inception was -61.58%, which is greater than XYLD's maximum drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBIZ and XYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EBIZXYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.58%

-33.46%

-28.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.73%

-5.29%

-22.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.73%

-15.53%

-12.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.21%

-18.66%

-39.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.77%

-0.15%

-25.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.33%

-3.72%

-20.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.41%

0.99%

+12.42%

Volatility

EBIZ vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison

Global X E-commerce ETF (EBIZ) has a higher volatility of 5.39% compared to Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) at 0.88%. This indicates that EBIZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EBIZXYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.39%

0.88%

+4.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.01%

5.37%

+9.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.82%

6.55%

+13.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.90%

11.22%

+17.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.68%

14.21%

+14.47%

EBIZ vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

EBIZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

EBIZ vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison

EBIZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than XYLD's 10.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EBIZ
Global X E-commerce ETF
0.60%0.51%0.23%0.00%0.10%0.57%0.84%0.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
10.52%10.51%11.54%10.51%13.43%9.07%7.93%5.76%7.12%5.18%3.23%4.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


EBIZ and XYLD have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EBIZ has higher volatility (5.39%) compared to XYLD (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EBIZ dropped -61.58% vs XYLD's -33.46%.

On 5-year performance, XYLD leads with 7.72% vs -3.65% for EBIZ. On fees, EBIZ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, XYLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XYLD has performed better with a 7.72% return vs -3.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EBIZ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XYLD.

XYLD has the higher dividend yield at 10.52%, compared with 0.60% for EBIZ.

EBIZ is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while XYLD is Derivative Income. EBIZ tracks Solactive E-commerce Index, while XYLD tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EBIZ and 0.60% for XYLD.

XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EBIZ and XYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer