EBIZ vs. XRT

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

EBIZ (Global X E-commerce ETF) and XRT (SPDR S&P Retail ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - EBIZ tracks the Solactive E-commerce Index while XRT tracks the S&P Retail Select Industry. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EBIZ returned -1.49%/yr vs 1.16%/yr for XRT. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EBIZ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XRT.

Performance

EBIZ vs. XRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X E-commerce ETF (EBIZ) and SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EBIZ achieves a -8.14% return, which is significantly lower than XRT's 6.60% return.

EBIZ

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: 7.07%
• 6M: -11.23%
• YTD: -8.14%
• 1Y: -3.72%
• 3Y*: 15.14%
• 5Y*: -1.49%
• 10Y*: —

XRT

• 1D: 1.55%
• 1M: 4.13%
• 6M: 0.05%
• YTD: 6.60%
• 1Y: 15.32%
• 3Y*: 12.68%
• 5Y*: 1.16%
• 10Y*: 8.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EBIZ vs. XRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EBIZ Global X E-commerce ETF	-8.14%	17.74%	31.26%	30.88%	-40.96%	-13.26%	74.39%	32.76%	-10.56%
XRT SPDR S&P Retail ETF	6.60%	8.07%	11.78%	21.53%	-31.64%	42.60%	41.91%	14.12%	-11.19%

Correlation

The correlation between EBIZ and XRT is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2018	0.67

The correlation between EBIZ and XRT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

EBIZ vs. XRT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EBIZ	XRT
Consumer Cyclical	75.4%	76.5%
Technology	13.6%	1.4%
Industrials	4.8%	-
Real Estate	2.2%	-
Communication Services	1.9%	1.5%
Healthcare	1.7%	1.3%
Financial Services	0.4%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	19.2%
Energy	-	1.3%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

EBIZ vs. XRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EBIZ

EBIZ Risk / Return Rank: 8
EBIZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
EBIZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
EBIZ Omega Ratio Rank: 7
EBIZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
EBIZ Martin Ratio Rank: 8

XRT

XRT Risk / Return Rank: 26
XRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
XRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
XRT Omega Ratio Rank: 24
XRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
XRT Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EBIZ vs. XRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X E-commerce ETF (EBIZ) and SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EBIZ	XRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.18	0.75	-0.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.12	1.23	-1.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.14	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.13	1.14	-1.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.24	2.56	-2.80

EBIZ vs. XRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EBIZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is lower than the XRT Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EBIZ and XRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EBIZ vs. XRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBIZ drawdown since its inception was -61.58%, smaller than the maximum XRT drawdown of -65.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBIZ and XRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	EBIZ	XRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.58%	-65.81%	+4.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.73%	-13.53%	-14.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.73%	-25.62%	-2.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-56.69%	-44.57%	-12.12%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-47.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.50%	-6.27%	-13.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.32%	-14.97%	-9.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.34%	6.01%	+9.33%

Volatility

EBIZ vs. XRT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X E-commerce ETF (EBIZ) is 5.62%, while SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) has a volatility of 6.07%. This indicates that EBIZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EBIZ	XRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.62%	6.07%	-0.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.81%	14.53%	+1.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.34%	20.63%	-0.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.96%	26.89%	+2.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.55%	27.16%	+1.39%

EBIZ vs. XRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EBIZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XRT's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

EBIZ vs. XRT - Dividend Comparison

EBIZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than XRT's 0.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EBIZ Global X E-commerce ETF	0.51%	0.51%	0.23%	0.00%	0.10%	0.57%	0.84%	0.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XRT SPDR S&P Retail ETF	0.74%	0.77%	1.52%	1.40%	2.15%	1.55%	1.01%	1.57%	1.51%	1.52%	1.36%	1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EBIZ and XRT in my portfolio?

EBIZ and XRT have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EBIZ or XRT?

XRT has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to EBIZ (5.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EBIZ dropped -61.58% vs XRT's -65.81%.

Which ETF is better, EBIZ or XRT?

On 5-year performance, XRT leads with 1.16% vs -1.49% for EBIZ. On fees, XRT is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, EBIZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EBIZ or XRT?

Over the 5-year period, XRT has performed better with a 1.16% return vs -1.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EBIZ or XRT?

XRT is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EBIZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EBIZ or XRT?

XRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.51% for EBIZ.

What is the main difference between EBIZ and XRT?

EBIZ tracks Solactive E-commerce Index, while XRT tracks S&P Retail Select Industry. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EBIZ and 0.35% for XRT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.75 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.