EBIZ vs. URA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EBIZ (Global X E-commerce ETF) and URA (Global X Uranium ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EBIZ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Solactive E-commerce Index, while URA is a Uranium fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EBIZ returned -4.29%/yr vs 20.40%/yr for URA. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EBIZ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for URA.

Performance

EBIZ vs. URA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X E-commerce ETF (EBIZ) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EBIZ achieves a -16.65% return, which is significantly lower than URA's 6.67% return.

EBIZ

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: -2.00%
• YTD: -16.65%
• 6M: -17.86%
• 1Y: -8.55%
• 3Y*: 15.19%
• 5Y*: -4.29%
• 10Y*: —

URA

• 1D: -2.61%
• 1M: -6.90%
• YTD: 6.67%
• 6M: 2.57%
• 1Y: 27.21%
• 3Y*: 34.68%
• 5Y*: 20.40%
• 10Y*: 16.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EBIZ vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EBIZ Global X E-commerce ETF	-16.65%	17.74%	31.26%	30.88%	-40.96%	-13.26%	74.39%	32.76%	-10.56%
URA Global X Uranium ETF	6.67%	67.18%	-0.58%	46.25%	-11.32%	57.57%	41.33%	-3.54%	-6.59%

Correlation

The correlation between EBIZ and URA is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2018	0.46

EBIZ vs. URA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EBIZ	URA
Consumer Cyclical	76.0%	-
Technology	12.9%	0.9%
Industrials	4.9%	22.7%
Real Estate	2.3%	-
Healthcare	1.8%	-
Communication Services	1.7%	-
Financial Services	0.3%	-
Basic Materials	-	4.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	64.2%
Utilities	-	7.4%

Return for Risk

EBIZ vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EBIZ

EBIZ Risk / Return Rank: 6
EBIZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
EBIZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
EBIZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5
EBIZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
EBIZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6

URA

URA Risk / Return Rank: 19
URA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
URA Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
URA Omega Ratio Rank: 19
URA Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
URA Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EBIZ vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X E-commerce ETF (EBIZ) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EBIZ	URA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.43	0.53	-0.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.47	1.09	-1.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.13	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.31	0.87	-1.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.59	1.87	-2.46

EBIZ vs. URA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EBIZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is lower than the URA Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EBIZ and URA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EBIZ vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBIZ drawdown since its inception was -61.58%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBIZ and URA.

Drawdown Indicators

	EBIZ	URA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.58%	-93.54%	+31.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.73%	-31.48%	+3.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.73%	-37.81%	+10.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-58.21%	-37.90%	-20.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-61.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.95%	-48.27%	+21.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.33%	-74.90%	+50.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.43%	14.58%	-0.15%

Volatility

EBIZ vs. URA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X E-commerce ETF (EBIZ) is 5.25%, while Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a volatility of 17.86%. This indicates that EBIZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EBIZ	URA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.25%	17.86%	-12.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.43%	39.53%	-24.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.93%	51.33%	-31.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.95%	43.92%	-14.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.62%	37.95%	-9.33%

EBIZ vs. URA - Expense Ratio Comparison

EBIZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than URA's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

EBIZ vs. URA - Dividend Comparison

EBIZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than URA's 4.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EBIZ Global X E-commerce ETF	0.61%	0.51%	0.23%	0.00%	0.10%	0.57%	0.84%	0.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
URA Global X Uranium ETF	4.57%	4.88%	2.86%	6.07%	0.76%	5.84%	1.69%	1.66%	0.44%	2.03%	7.28%	1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EBIZ and URA in my portfolio?

EBIZ and URA have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EBIZ or URA?

URA has higher volatility (17.86%) compared to EBIZ (5.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EBIZ dropped -61.58% vs URA's -93.54%.

Which ETF is better, EBIZ or URA?

On 5-year performance, URA leads with 20.40% vs -4.29% for EBIZ. On fees, EBIZ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, EBIZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EBIZ or URA?

Over the 5-year period, URA has performed better with a 20.40% return vs -4.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EBIZ or URA?

EBIZ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for URA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EBIZ or URA?

URA has the higher dividend yield at 4.57%, compared with 0.61% for EBIZ.

What is the main difference between EBIZ and URA?

EBIZ is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while URA is Uranium. EBIZ tracks Solactive E-commerce Index, while URA tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EBIZ and 0.69% for URA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

URA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.