EBIZ vs. RTH

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

EBIZ (Global X E-commerce ETF) and RTH (VanEck Vectors Retail ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - EBIZ tracks the Solactive E-commerce Index while RTH tracks the MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EBIZ returned -1.49%/yr vs 9.36%/yr for RTH. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EBIZ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RTH.

Performance

EBIZ vs. RTH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X E-commerce ETF (EBIZ) and VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EBIZ achieves a -8.14% return, which is significantly lower than RTH's 5.42% return.

EBIZ

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: 7.07%
• 6M: -11.23%
• YTD: -8.14%
• 1Y: -3.72%
• 3Y*: 15.14%
• 5Y*: -1.49%
• 10Y*: —

RTH

• 1D: 1.62%
• 1M: 0.38%
• 6M: -0.47%
• YTD: 5.42%
• 1Y: 12.25%
• 3Y*: 15.34%
• 5Y*: 9.36%
• 10Y*: 13.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EBIZ vs. RTH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EBIZ Global X E-commerce ETF	-8.14%	17.74%	31.26%	30.88%	-40.96%	-13.26%	74.39%	32.76%	-10.56%
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF	5.42%	12.36%	20.02%	20.07%	-17.67%	24.94%	31.62%	29.06%	-7.91%

Correlation

The correlation between EBIZ and RTH is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2018	0.66

The correlation between EBIZ and RTH shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EBIZ vs. RTH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EBIZ	RTH
Consumer Cyclical	75.4%	57.2%
Technology	13.6%	-
Industrials	4.8%	2.6%
Real Estate	2.2%	-
Communication Services	1.9%	-
Healthcare	1.7%	13.4%
Financial Services	0.4%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	26.8%
Energy	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

EBIZ vs. RTH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EBIZ

EBIZ Risk / Return Rank: 8
EBIZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
EBIZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
EBIZ Omega Ratio Rank: 7
EBIZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
EBIZ Martin Ratio Rank: 8

RTH

RTH Risk / Return Rank: 34
RTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
RTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
RTH Omega Ratio Rank: 31
RTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
RTH Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EBIZ vs. RTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X E-commerce ETF (EBIZ) and VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EBIZ	RTH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.18	0.98	-1.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.12	1.49	-1.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.18	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.13	1.57	-1.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.24	4.53	-4.77

EBIZ vs. RTH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EBIZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is lower than the RTH Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EBIZ and RTH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EBIZ vs. RTH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBIZ drawdown since its inception was -61.58%, which is greater than RTH's maximum drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBIZ and RTH.

Drawdown Indicators

	EBIZ	RTH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.58%	-42.32%	-19.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.73%	-7.83%	-19.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.73%	-13.80%	-13.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-56.69%	-25.00%	-31.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-25.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.50%	-2.57%	-16.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.32%	-7.33%	-16.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.34%	2.71%	+12.63%

Volatility

EBIZ vs. RTH - Volatility Comparison

Global X E-commerce ETF (EBIZ) has a higher volatility of 5.62% compared to VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) at 4.67%. This indicates that EBIZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EBIZ	RTH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.62%	4.67%	+0.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.81%	9.86%	+5.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.34%	12.55%	+7.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.96%	16.89%	+12.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.55%	17.57%	+10.98%

EBIZ vs. RTH - Expense Ratio Comparison

EBIZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than RTH's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

EBIZ vs. RTH - Dividend Comparison

EBIZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than RTH's 0.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EBIZ Global X E-commerce ETF	0.51%	0.51%	0.23%	0.00%	0.10%	0.57%	0.84%	0.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF	0.92%	0.97%	0.77%	1.07%	1.16%	0.78%	0.64%	0.91%	1.05%	1.56%	1.84%	2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EBIZ and RTH in my portfolio?

EBIZ and RTH have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EBIZ or RTH?

EBIZ has higher volatility (5.62%) compared to RTH (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EBIZ dropped -61.58% vs RTH's -42.32%.

Which ETF is better, EBIZ or RTH?

On 5-year performance, RTH leads with 9.36% vs -1.49% for EBIZ. On fees, RTH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RTH has been the lower-risk option at 4.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EBIZ or RTH?

Over the 5-year period, RTH has performed better with a 9.36% return vs -1.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EBIZ or RTH?

RTH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EBIZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EBIZ or RTH?

RTH has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.51% for EBIZ.

What is the main difference between EBIZ and RTH?

EBIZ tracks Solactive E-commerce Index, while RTH tracks MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EBIZ and 0.35% for RTH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.