EBIZ vs. QQQ
EBIZ (Global X E-commerce ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EBIZ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Solactive E-commerce Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EBIZ returned -3.65%/yr vs 17.97%/yr for QQQ. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EBIZ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
EBIZ vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EBIZ achieves a -15.29% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.30% return.
EBIZ
- 1D
- -2.05%
- 1M
- -2.71%
- YTD
- -15.29%
- 6M
- -15.50%
- 1Y
- -8.74%
- 3Y*
- 17.16%
- 5Y*
- -3.65%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 10.60%
- YTD
- 21.30%
- 6M
- 19.66%
- 1Y
- 41.82%
- 3Y*
- 28.78%
- 5Y*
- 17.97%
- 10Y*
- 21.94%
EBIZ vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBIZ Global X E-commerce ETF | -15.29% | 17.74% | 31.26% | 30.88% | -40.96% | -13.26% | 74.39% | 32.76% | -11.01% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 21.30% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -8.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between EBIZ and QQQ is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2018 | 0.72 |
The correlation between EBIZ and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
EBIZ vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EBIZ
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Industrials
Real Estate
Healthcare
Communication Services
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
EBIZ
QQQ
Technology
EBIZ
QQQ
Industrials
EBIZ
QQQ
Real Estate
EBIZ
QQQ
Healthcare
EBIZ
QQQ
Communication Services
EBIZ
QQQ
Financial Services
EBIZ
QQQ
Basic Materials
EBIZ
-
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
EBIZ
-
QQQ
Energy
EBIZ
-
QQQ
Utilities
EBIZ
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EBIZ vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
EBIZ
QQQ
EBIZ vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X E-commerce ETF (EBIZ) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EBIZ | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.45 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.32 | 3.51 | -3.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.65 | 13.49 | -14.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EBIZ | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.44 | 2.64 | -3.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.13 | 0.81 | -0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.41 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
EBIZ vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EBIZ drawdown since its inception was -61.58%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBIZ and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EBIZ | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.58% | -82.97% | +21.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.73% | -11.96% | -15.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.73% | -22.77% | -4.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.21% | -35.12% | -23.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.77% | -0.26% | -25.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.33% | -32.79% | +8.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.41% | 3.11% | +10.30% |
Volatility
EBIZ vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
Global X E-commerce ETF (EBIZ) has a higher volatility of 5.39% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.49%. This indicates that EBIZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EBIZ | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.39% | 4.49% | +0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.01% | 12.10% | +2.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.82% | 15.94% | +3.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.90% | 22.38% | +6.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.68% | 22.29% | +6.39% |
EBIZ vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EBIZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
EBIZ vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
EBIZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBIZ Global X E-commerce ETF | 0.60% | 0.51% | 0.23% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 0.57% | 0.84% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EBIZ and QQQ have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EBIZ has higher volatility (5.39%) compared to QQQ (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EBIZ dropped -61.58% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 5-year performance, QQQ leads with 17.97% vs -3.65% for EBIZ. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 17.97% return vs -3.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EBIZ.
EBIZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.
EBIZ is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. EBIZ tracks Solactive E-commerce Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EBIZ and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EBIZ and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer