EBIT.TO vs. SIXY.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD (EBIT.TO) and Evolve Big Six Canadian Banks UltraYield Index ETF (SIXY.TO).
EBIT.TO and SIXY.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EBIT.TO is a passively managed fund by Evolve that tracks the performance of the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate. It was launched on Feb 17, 2021. SIXY.TO is a passively managed fund by Evolve that tracks the performance of the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. It was launched on Dec 1, 2025. Both EBIT.TO and SIXY.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EBIT.TO vs. SIXY.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EBIT.TO vs. SIXY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EBIT.TO Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD | -21.88% | -5.80% |
SIXY.TO Evolve Big Six Canadian Banks UltraYield Index ETF | 0.37% | 5.33% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EBIT.TO achieves a -21.88% return, which is significantly lower than SIXY.TO's 0.37% return.
EBIT.TO
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- 5.14%
- YTD
- -21.88%
- 6M
- -41.28%
- 1Y
- -21.84%
- 3Y*
- 32.34%
- 5Y*
- 2.99%
- 10Y*
- —
SIXY.TO
- 1D
- 2.33%
- 1M
- -5.44%
- YTD
- 0.37%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EBIT.TO vs. SIXY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EBIT.TO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SIXY.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EBIT.TO vs. SIXY.TO — Risk / Return Rank
EBIT.TO
SIXY.TO
EBIT.TO vs. SIXY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD (EBIT.TO) and Evolve Big Six Canadian Banks UltraYield Index ETF (SIXY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EBIT.TO | SIXY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.45 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.45 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.96 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EBIT.TO | SIXY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 1.07 | -1.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between EBIT.TO and SIXY.TO is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EBIT.TO vs. SIXY.TO - Dividend Comparison
EBIT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SIXY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.76%.
| TTM | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EBIT.TO Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SIXY.TO Evolve Big Six Canadian Banks UltraYield Index ETF | 5.76% | 1.59% |
Drawdowns
EBIT.TO vs. SIXY.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EBIT.TO drawdown since its inception was -75.45%, which is greater than SIXY.TO's maximum drawdown of -9.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBIT.TO and SIXY.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EBIT.TO | SIXY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.45% | -9.64% | -65.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.63% | -7.31% | -39.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.78% | -2.19% | -30.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.74% | — | — |
Volatility
EBIT.TO vs. SIXY.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EBIT.TO | SIXY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.82% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.35% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.68% | 17.71% | +26.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.10% | 17.71% | +37.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.37% | 17.71% | +37.66% |