PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIXY.TO vs. ZEB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SIXY.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve Big Six Canadian Banks UltraYield Index ETF (SIXY.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SIXY.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXY.TO achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than ZEB.TO's 1.92% return.


SIXY.TO

1D
2.33%
1M
-5.44%
YTD
0.37%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZEB.TO

1D
2.47%
1M
-3.87%
YTD
1.92%
6M
14.68%
1Y
52.04%
3Y*
25.62%
5Y*
16.79%
10Y*
14.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SIXY.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXY.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ZEB.TO's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SIXY.TO vs. ZEB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXY.TO

ZEB.TO
ZEB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
ZEB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXY.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Big Six Canadian Banks UltraYield Index ETF (SIXY.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SIXY.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SIXY.TOZEB.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.07

0.82

+0.25

Correlation

The correlation between SIXY.TO and ZEB.TO is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SIXY.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Dividend Comparison

SIXY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.76%, more than ZEB.TO's 2.95% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SIXY.TO
Evolve Big Six Canadian Banks UltraYield Index ETF
5.76%1.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZEB.TO
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF
2.95%2.95%3.98%4.75%4.29%3.13%4.15%3.65%3.64%3.02%3.19%3.70%

Drawdowns

SIXY.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXY.TO drawdown since its inception was -9.64%, smaller than the maximum ZEB.TO drawdown of -39.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXY.TO and ZEB.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SIXY.TOZEB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.64%

-39.69%

+30.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.31%

-5.86%

-1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.19%

-5.70%

+3.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

Volatility

SIXY.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SIXY.TOZEB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.71%

13.34%

+4.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.71%

13.24%

+4.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.71%

16.82%

+0.89%