PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EBIT.TO vs. BTCY.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EBIT.TO vs. BTCY.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD (EBIT.TO) and Purpose Bitcoin Yield ETF (BTCY.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EBIT.TO achieves a -27.29% return, which is significantly higher than BTCY.TO's -32.82% return.


EBIT.TO

1D
-2.74%
1M
-0.63%
6M
-17.83%
YTD
-27.29%
1Y
-44.48%
3Y*
29.24%
5Y*
10.15%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.87%

BTCY.TO

1D
-3.14%
1M
1.57%
6M
-23.57%
YTD
-32.82%
1Y
-48.32%
3Y*
20.27%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-4.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$146.98KCA$136.83KCA$230.47K
CA$283.51KCA$498.45KCA$1.05M

EBIT.TO vs. BTCY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
EBIT.TO
Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD
-27.29%-11.88%134.59%146.50%-62.36%-20.63%
BTCY.TO
Purpose Bitcoin Yield ETF
-32.82%-9.07%112.59%111.84%-64.51%-18.42%

Correlation

The correlation between EBIT.TO and BTCY.TO is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2021

0.95

The correlation between EBIT.TO and BTCY.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EBIT.TO vs. BTCY.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EBIT.TO
EBIT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
EBIT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EBIT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
EBIT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
EBIT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
EBIT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

BTCY.TO
BTCY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BTCY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EBIT.TO vs. BTCY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD (EBIT.TO) and Purpose Bitcoin Yield ETF (BTCY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EBIT.TOBTCY.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

0.83

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.88

-0.89

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.31

-1.40

+0.09

EBIT.TO vs. BTCY.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EBIT.TO Sharpe Ratio is -1.06, which is comparable to the BTCY.TO Sharpe Ratio of -1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EBIT.TO and BTCY.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EBIT.TO vs. BTCY.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBIT.TO drawdown since its inception was -75.45%, which is greater than BTCY.TO's maximum drawdown of -71.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBIT.TO and BTCY.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EBIT.TOBTCY.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.45%

-71.53%

-3.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.08%

-56.40%

+3.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.08%

-56.40%

+3.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.33%

-52.41%

+2.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.53%

-33.72%

+0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.45%

35.54%

-0.09%

Volatility

EBIT.TO vs. BTCY.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD (EBIT.TO) is 8.18%, while Purpose Bitcoin Yield ETF (BTCY.TO) has a volatility of 10.89%. This indicates that EBIT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTCY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EBIT.TOBTCY.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.18%

10.89%

-2.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.44%

41.24%

-7.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.81%

49.59%

-5.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.89%

50.78%

+1.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.35%

50.78%

+3.57%

EBIT.TO vs. BTCY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EBIT.TO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCY.TO's 1.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

EBIT.TO vs. BTCY.TO - Dividend Comparison

EBIT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTCY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.44%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BTCY.TO
Purpose Bitcoin Yield ETF
25.44%15.11%16.69%9.20%24.17%1.23%
EBIT.TO
Evolve Bitcoin ETF CAD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, EBIT.TO and BTCY.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, EBIT.TO is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EBIT.TO is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.43% for BTCY.TO.

They also come from different issuers: Evolve and Purpose. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for EBIT.TO and 1.43% for BTCY.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EBIT.TO and BTCY.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer