EBI vs. MSTZ

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

EBI (Longview Advantage ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EBI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Longview, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EBI returned 27.99% vs 264.10% for MSTZ. At a correlation of -0.43, they often move in opposite directions. EBI charges 0.24%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.

Performance

EBI vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Longview Advantage ETF (EBI) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EBI achieves a 16.15% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -26.97% return.

EBI

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 1.34%
• 6M: 12.29%
• YTD: 16.15%
• 1Y: 27.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MSTZ

• 1D: -1.53%
• 1M: 39.32%
• 6M: -19.19%
• YTD: -26.97%
• 1Y: 264.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EBI vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EBI Longview Advantage ETF	16.15%	15.82%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	-26.97%	-31.23%

Correlation

The correlation between EBI and MSTZ is -0.40, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2025	-0.43

Return for Risk

EBI vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EBI

EBI Risk / Return Rank: 87
EBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
EBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
EBI Omega Ratio Rank: 84
EBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
EBI Martin Ratio Rank: 89

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 60
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 63
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EBI vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Longview Advantage ETF (EBI) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EBI	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.23	1.64	+0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.11	2.34	+0.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.30	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.87	2.86	+1.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.71	5.59	+10.12

EBI vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EBI Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is higher than the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EBI and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EBI vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBI drawdown since its inception was -17.05%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBI and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	EBI	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.05%	-99.38%	+82.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.09%	-84.89%	+77.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-97.51%	+97.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.98%	-94.53%	+92.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.75%	43.41%	-41.66%

Volatility

EBI vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Longview Advantage ETF (EBI) is 3.37%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 56.46%. This indicates that EBI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EBI	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.37%	56.46%	-53.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.09%	135.20%	-126.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.29%	148.41%	-136.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.60%	171.17%	-153.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.60%	171.17%	-153.57%

EBI vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EBI has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

EBI vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

EBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
EBI Longview Advantage ETF	1.11%	1.05%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EBI and MSTZ in my portfolio?

EBI and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EBI or MSTZ?

MSTZ has higher volatility (56.46%) compared to EBI (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EBI dropped -17.05% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

Which ETF is better, EBI or MSTZ?

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 264.10% vs 27.99% for EBI. On fees, EBI is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, EBI has been the lower-risk option at 3.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EBI or MSTZ?

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 264.10% return vs 27.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EBI or MSTZ?

EBI is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EBI or MSTZ?

EBI has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

What is the main difference between EBI and MSTZ?

EBI is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Longview and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for EBI and 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.