EBABX vs. AMFIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund Class A (EBABX) and AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX).
EBABX is an actively managed fund by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Nov 17, 2009. AMFIX is managed by AAMA. It was launched on Jun 30, 2017.
Performance
EBABX vs. AMFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EBABX vs. AMFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBABX Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund Class A | -0.94% | 8.87% | 4.21% | 5.30% | -13.08% | 2.76% | 5.62% | 10.54% | -1.09% | 1.41% |
AMFIX AAMA Income Fund | 0.21% | 3.74% | 3.48% | 3.84% | -6.26% | -1.37% | 2.24% | 2.47% | 0.89% | -0.44% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EBABX achieves a -0.94% return, which is significantly lower than AMFIX's 0.21% return.
EBABX
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -2.80%
- YTD
- -0.94%
- 6M
- 0.33%
- 1Y
- 4.90%
- 3Y*
- 4.77%
- 5Y*
- 1.15%
- 10Y*
- 3.49%
AMFIX
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- YTD
- 0.21%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- 2.97%
- 3Y*
- 3.23%
- 5Y*
- 0.72%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EBABX vs. AMFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EBABX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than AMFIX's 0.92% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EBABX vs. AMFIX — Risk / Return Rank
EBABX
AMFIX
EBABX vs. AMFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund Class A (EBABX) and AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EBABX | AMFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.29 | 3.05 | -1.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.86 | 4.95 | -3.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.69 | -0.46 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 4.18 | -2.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.84 | 21.12 | -14.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EBABX | AMFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | 3.05 | -1.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.34 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.56 | +0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between EBABX and AMFIX is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EBABX vs. AMFIX - Dividend Comparison
EBABX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than AMFIX's 2.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBABX Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund Class A | 4.54% | 4.89% | 5.31% | 3.83% | 3.77% | 3.23% | 3.64% | 3.71% | 3.89% | 3.29% | 3.66% | 5.41% |
AMFIX AAMA Income Fund | 2.22% | 2.08% | 2.44% | 1.70% | 0.83% | 0.57% | 0.83% | 1.24% | 1.24% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EBABX vs. AMFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EBABX drawdown since its inception was -17.19%, which is greater than AMFIX's maximum drawdown of -9.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBABX and AMFIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EBABX | AMFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.19% | -9.35% | -7.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.26% | -0.74% | -2.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.19% | -8.91% | -8.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.80% | -0.49% | -2.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.67% | -2.06% | -1.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.87% | 0.15% | +0.72% |
Volatility
EBABX vs. AMFIX - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund Class A (EBABX) has a higher volatility of 1.62% compared to AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX) at 0.48%. This indicates that EBABX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EBABX | AMFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.62% | 0.48% | +1.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.60% | 0.72% | +1.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.25% | 0.98% | +3.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.26% | 2.16% | +3.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.68% | 1.75% | +2.93% |