EATZ vs. YCS

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

EATZ (AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - EATZ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the JPY/USD 4:00 p.m. ET Cross Rate. EATZ is actively managed, while YCS is passively managed. Their -0.01 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. EATZ charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for YCS.

Performance

EATZ vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

EATZ

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

YCS

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: -4.94%
• 6M: 4.42%
• YTD: 5.40%
• 1Y: 22.68%
• 3Y*: 17.44%
• 5Y*: 22.89%
• 10Y*: 13.35%
• ALL TIME*: 6.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen	$2.59M	$2.15M	$1.60M

EATZ vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	4.80%	-6.67%	23.21%	25.23%	-20.68%	-4.90%
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen	5.40%	9.04%	35.41%	28.70%	29.09%	12.20%

Correlation

The correlation between EATZ and YCS is -0.15, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.15
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	-0.05
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	-0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2021	-0.01

The correlation between EATZ and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EATZ vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EATZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

YCS

YCS Risk / Return Rank: 56
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 52
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EATZ vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EATZ	YCS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.39	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.80	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.27	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.69	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.73	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	EATZ	YCS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-49.56%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.48%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.05%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.32%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-27.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-7.34%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-19.75%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.34%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EATZ	YCS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.95%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.87%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	16.43%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	21.21%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	18.61%	—

EATZ vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

EATZ has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than YCS's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

EATZ vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

EATZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	0.48%	0.50%	0.18%	0.49%	2.35%	0.15%
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EATZ and YCS in my portfolio?

EATZ and YCS have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EATZ or YCS?

On fees, YCS is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EATZ or YCS?

YCS is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for EATZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EATZ or YCS?

EATZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

What is the main difference between EATZ and YCS?

EATZ is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for EATZ and 0.95% for YCS.