EATZ vs. RSPD

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

EATZ (AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF) and RSPD (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds. EATZ is actively managed, while RSPD is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EATZ returned 2.20%/yr vs 3.29%/yr for RSPD. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EATZ charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPD.

Performance

EATZ vs. RSPD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EATZ achieves a 4.80% return, which is significantly higher than RSPD's -3.92% return.

EATZ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 4.80%
• 6M: 4.07%
• 1Y: -6.74%
• 3Y*: 10.53%
• 5Y*: 2.20%
• 10Y*: —

RSPD

• 1D: -1.07%
• 1M: -0.38%
• YTD: -3.92%
• 6M: -2.73%
• 1Y: 6.90%
• 3Y*: 9.93%
• 5Y*: 3.29%
• 10Y*: 8.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EATZ vs. RSPD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	4.80%	-6.67%	23.21%	25.23%	-20.68%	-5.06%
RSPD Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF	-3.92%	7.98%	13.37%	22.55%	-24.03%	7.39%

Correlation

The correlation between EATZ and RSPD is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2021	0.77

The correlation between EATZ and RSPD shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EATZ vs. RSPD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EATZ	RSPD
Consumer Cyclical	78.2%	93.8%
Consumer Defensive	16.9%	-
Industrials	4.9%	1.9%
Communication Services	2.3%	2.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.1%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	2.2%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

EATZ vs. RSPD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EATZ

EATZ Risk / Return Rank: 10
EATZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
EATZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
EATZ Omega Ratio Rank: 10
EATZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
EATZ Martin Ratio Rank: 9

RSPD

RSPD Risk / Return Rank: 14
RSPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
RSPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
RSPD Omega Ratio Rank: 14
RSPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
RSPD Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EATZ vs. RSPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EATZ	RSPD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.10	0.38	-0.28
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.28	0.71	-0.43
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.08	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.11	0.50	-0.38
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.21	1.25	-1.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EATZ vs. RSPD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EATZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the RSPD Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EATZ and RSPD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EATZ	RSPD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10	0.38	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10	0.15	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.35	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.12	0.33	-0.21

Drawdowns

EATZ vs. RSPD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EATZ drawdown since its inception was -34.40%, smaller than the maximum RSPD drawdown of -68.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EATZ and RSPD.

Drawdown Indicators

	EATZ	RSPD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.40%	-68.00%	+33.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.21%	-13.80%	-9.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.21%	-21.01%	-2.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.34%	-34.41%	+1.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-48.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.56%	-8.70%	-4.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.40%	-10.70%	-2.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.82%	5.49%	+7.33%

Volatility

EATZ vs. RSPD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) is 4.91%, while Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) has a volatility of 5.79%. This indicates that EATZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSPD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EATZ	RSPD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.91%	5.79%	-0.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.48%	13.45%	+0.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.81%	18.26%	+0.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.65%	22.10%	-0.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.60%	23.11%	-1.51%

EATZ vs. RSPD - Expense Ratio Comparison

EATZ has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than RSPD's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

EATZ vs. RSPD - Dividend Comparison

EATZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than RSPD's 1.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	0.48%	0.50%	0.18%	0.49%	2.35%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RSPD Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF	1.02%	1.08%	0.84%	1.09%	0.99%	0.53%	0.81%	1.59%	1.67%	1.45%	1.27%	1.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EATZ and RSPD in my portfolio?

EATZ and RSPD have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EATZ or RSPD?

RSPD has higher volatility (5.79%) compared to EATZ (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EATZ dropped -34.40% vs RSPD's -68.00%.

Which ETF is better, EATZ or RSPD?

On 5-year performance, RSPD leads with 3.29% vs 2.20% for EATZ. On fees, RSPD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, EATZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EATZ or RSPD?

Over the 5-year period, RSPD has performed better with a 3.29% return vs 2.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EATZ or RSPD?

RSPD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for EATZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EATZ or RSPD?

RSPD has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.48% for EATZ.

What is the main difference between EATZ and RSPD?

They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for EATZ and 0.40% for RSPD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSPD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.38 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.