PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EART vs. UGA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EART vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EART achieves a 15.33% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 70.69% return.


EART

1D
-1.97%
1M
-1.23%
YTD
15.33%
6M
25.98%
1Y
109.62%
3Y*
21.49%
5Y*
10Y*

UGA

1D
-2.73%
1M
-12.25%
YTD
70.69%
6M
59.72%
1Y
79.48%
3Y*
20.80%
5Y*
24.41%
10Y*
14.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EART vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
EART
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF
15.33%98.48%-7.19%-19.75%-16.33%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
70.69%-2.00%3.77%1.27%30.25%

Correlation

The correlation between EART and UGA is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2022

0.15

The correlation between EART and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EART vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EART
EART Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
EART Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EART Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
EART Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
EART Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
EART Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

UGA
UGA Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EART vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EARTUGADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.37

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.23

5.37

-1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.37

12.86

+0.51

EART vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EART Sharpe Ratio is 2.90, which is comparable to the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EART and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EARTUGADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.90

2.27

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.12

+0.14

Drawdowns

EART vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EART drawdown since its inception was -53.68%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EART and UGA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EARTUGADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.68%

-86.59%

+32.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.03%

-14.88%

-11.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.20%

-26.68%

-10.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.64%

-14.75%

+2.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.14%

-36.76%

+7.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.23%

6.20%

+2.03%

Volatility

EART vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) have volatilities of 11.16% and 11.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EARTUGADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.16%

11.64%

-0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.43%

30.48%

+0.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.02%

35.27%

+2.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.97%

34.40%

-0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.97%

37.27%

-3.30%

EART vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

EART has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

EART vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

EART's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
EART
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF
0.56%0.65%1.06%1.83%2.04%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EART and UGA have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UGA has higher volatility (11.64%) compared to EART (11.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EART dropped -53.68% vs UGA's -86.59%.

On 3-year performance, EART leads with 21.49% vs 20.80% for UGA. On fees, EART is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, EART has been the lower-risk option at 11.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, EART has performed better with a 21.49% return vs 20.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EART is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.

EART has the higher dividend yield at 0.56%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.

EART is categorized as Materials, while UGA is Oil & Gas. EART tracks Solactive Rare Earth & Critical Materials Index, while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EART and 0.75% for UGA.

EART currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EART and UGA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer