EAOR vs. THRV
EAOR (iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF) and THRV (Prospera Income ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. EAOR is passively managed, while THRV is actively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EAOR charges 0.18%/yr vs 1.80%/yr for THRV.
Performance
EAOR vs. THRV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EAOR achieves a 7.50% return, which is significantly higher than THRV's 1.86% return.
EAOR
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 3.41%
- YTD
- 7.50%
- 6M
- 7.84%
- 1Y
- 19.56%
- 3Y*
- 13.83%
- 5Y*
- 6.41%
- 10Y*
- —
THRV
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 1.86%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EAOR vs. THRV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EAOR iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF | 7.50% | 2.29% |
THRV Prospera Income ETF | 1.86% | 0.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between EAOR and THRV is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EAOR vs. THRV — Risk / Return Rank
EAOR
THRV
EAOR vs. THRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) and Prospera Income ETF (THRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EAOR | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.04 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EAOR | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 1.04 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
EAOR vs. THRV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAOR drawdown since its inception was -22.91%, which is greater than THRV's maximum drawdown of -1.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOR and THRV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EAOR | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.91% | -1.50% | -21.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.65% | -0.51% | -0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.05% | -0.44% | -4.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.50% | — | — |
Volatility
EAOR vs. THRV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EAOR | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.79% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.90% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.55% | 2.92% | +5.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.52% | 2.92% | +7.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.39% | 2.92% | +7.47% |
EAOR vs. THRV - Expense Ratio Comparison
EAOR has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than THRV's 1.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
EAOR vs. THRV - Dividend Comparison
EAOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, less than THRV's 4.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAOR iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF | 2.34% | 2.45% | 2.52% | 2.39% | 1.99% | 1.39% | 1.07% |
THRV Prospera Income ETF | 4.71% | 1.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EAOR and THRV have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EAOR is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EAOR is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.80% for THRV.
THRV has the higher dividend yield at 4.71%, compared with 2.34% for EAOR.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Prospera Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EAOR and 1.80% for THRV.
Find the right allocation for EAOR and THRV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer