EAOR vs. SPLS
EAOR (iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF) and SPLS (PIMCO U.S. Stocks PLUS Active Bond ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. EAOR is passively managed, while SPLS is actively managed. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.18% expense ratio.
Performance
EAOR vs. SPLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EAOR
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 3.41%
- YTD
- 7.50%
- 6M
- 7.84%
- 1Y
- 19.56%
- 3Y*
- 13.83%
- 5Y*
- 6.41%
- 10Y*
- —
SPLS
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 5.18%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EAOR vs. SPLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EAOR iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF | 5.84% |
SPLS PIMCO U.S. Stocks PLUS Active Bond ETF | 9.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between EAOR and SPLS is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2026 | 0.96 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EAOR vs. SPLS — Risk / Return Rank
EAOR
SPLS
EAOR vs. SPLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) and PIMCO U.S. Stocks PLUS Active Bond ETF (SPLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EAOR | SPLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.04 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EAOR | SPLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 1.82 | -0.94 |
Drawdowns
EAOR vs. SPLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAOR drawdown since its inception was -22.91%, which is greater than SPLS's maximum drawdown of -9.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOR and SPLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EAOR | SPLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.91% | -9.24% | -13.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.65% | -0.65% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.05% | -1.85% | -3.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.50% | — | — |
Volatility
EAOR vs. SPLS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EAOR | SPLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.79% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.90% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.55% | 15.02% | -6.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.52% | 15.02% | -4.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.39% | 15.02% | -4.63% |
EAOR vs. SPLS - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EAOR and SPLS have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EAOR vs. SPLS - Dividend Comparison
EAOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, more than SPLS's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAOR iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF | 2.34% | 2.45% | 2.52% | 2.39% | 1.99% | 1.39% | 1.07% |
SPLS PIMCO U.S. Stocks PLUS Active Bond ETF | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, EAOR and SPLS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EAOR and SPLS have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.
EAOR has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 0.22% for SPLS.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and PIMCO.
Find the right allocation for EAOR and SPLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer