PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EAOR vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EAOR vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAOR achieves a 7.50% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 8.76% return.


EAOR

1D
-0.65%
1M
3.41%
YTD
7.50%
6M
7.84%
1Y
19.56%
3Y*
13.83%
5Y*
6.41%
10Y*

DGRO

1D
-0.28%
1M
3.14%
YTD
8.76%
6M
8.75%
1Y
22.54%
3Y*
16.99%
5Y*
10.54%
10Y*
13.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAOR vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EAOR
iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF
7.50%15.59%10.69%14.96%-16.66%10.51%15.00%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
8.76%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%19.06%

Correlation

The correlation between EAOR and DGRO is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2020

0.82

The correlation between EAOR and DGRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EAOR vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EAOR
DGRO

Technology

22.3%
19.4%

Financial Services

10.3%
21.2%

Industrials

6.8%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

5.8%
5.7%

Communication Services

5.6%
0.1%

Healthcare

5.2%
16.4%

Consumer Defensive

2.8%
11.5%

Energy

2.3%
5.6%

Basic Materials

1.8%
2.5%

Utilities

1.7%
6.9%

Real Estate

1.2%

-

Technology

EAOR
22.3%
DGRO
19.4%

Financial Services

EAOR
10.3%
DGRO
21.2%

Industrials

EAOR
6.8%
DGRO
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

EAOR
5.8%
DGRO
5.7%

Communication Services

EAOR
5.6%
DGRO
0.1%

Healthcare

EAOR
5.2%
DGRO
16.4%

Consumer Defensive

EAOR
2.8%
DGRO
11.5%

Energy

EAOR
2.3%
DGRO
5.6%

Basic Materials

EAOR
1.8%
DGRO
2.5%

Utilities

EAOR
1.7%
DGRO
6.9%

Real Estate

EAOR
1.2%
DGRO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EAOR vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAOR
EAOR Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
EAOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAOR Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
EAOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAOR Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAOR vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EAORDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.43

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

3.50

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.04

13.52

-0.48

EAOR vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAOR Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAOR and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EAORDGRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

2.39

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.77

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.76

+0.11

Drawdowns

EAOR vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAOR drawdown since its inception was -22.91%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOR and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EAORDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.91%

-35.10%

+12.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.62%

-6.47%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.28%

-14.03%

+3.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.91%

-19.31%

-3.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-0.28%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.05%

-3.44%

-1.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.50%

1.67%

-0.17%

Volatility

EAOR vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) has a higher volatility of 2.79% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.21%. This indicates that EAOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EAORDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

2.21%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.90%

6.91%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.55%

9.48%

-0.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.52%

13.82%

-3.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.39%

16.62%

-6.23%

EAOR vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAOR has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EAOR vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

EAOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, more than DGRO's 1.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.96%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
EAOR
iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF
2.34%2.45%2.52%2.39%1.99%1.39%1.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EAOR and DGRO have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EAOR has higher volatility (2.79%) compared to DGRO (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAOR dropped -22.91% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 5-year performance, DGRO leads with 10.54% vs 6.41% for EAOR. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 10.54% return vs 6.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for EAOR.

EAOR has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 1.96% for DGRO.

EAOR is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. EAOR tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Growth Allocation Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EAOR and 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EAOR and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer