PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EAOR vs. AOK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EAOR vs. AOK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) and iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF (AOK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAOR achieves a 7.50% return, which is significantly higher than AOK's 4.26% return.


EAOR

1D
-0.65%
1M
3.41%
YTD
7.50%
6M
7.84%
1Y
19.56%
3Y*
13.83%
5Y*
6.41%
10Y*

AOK

1D
-0.41%
1M
1.66%
YTD
4.26%
6M
4.14%
1Y
12.11%
3Y*
9.28%
5Y*
3.71%
10Y*
5.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAOR vs. AOK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EAOR
iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF
7.50%15.59%10.69%14.96%-16.66%10.51%15.00%
AOK
iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF
4.26%11.26%6.58%10.85%-14.16%4.87%7.98%

Correlation

The correlation between EAOR and AOK is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2020

0.90

The correlation between EAOR and AOK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

EAOR vs. AOK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EAOR
AOK

Technology

22.3%
13.0%

Financial Services

10.3%
6.0%

Industrials

6.8%
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

5.8%
3.2%

Communication Services

5.6%
3.4%

Healthcare

5.2%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.8%
1.7%

Energy

2.3%
1.5%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.1%

Utilities

1.7%
0.9%

Real Estate

1.2%
0.5%

Technology

EAOR
22.3%
AOK
13.0%

Financial Services

EAOR
10.3%
AOK
6.0%

Industrials

EAOR
6.8%
AOK
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

EAOR
5.8%
AOK
3.2%

Communication Services

EAOR
5.6%
AOK
3.4%

Healthcare

EAOR
5.2%
AOK
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

EAOR
2.8%
AOK
1.7%

Energy

EAOR
2.3%
AOK
1.5%

Basic Materials

EAOR
1.8%
AOK
1.1%

Utilities

EAOR
1.7%
AOK
0.9%

Real Estate

EAOR
1.2%
AOK
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EAOR vs. AOK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAOR
EAOR Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
EAOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAOR Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
EAOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAOR Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

AOK
AOK Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
AOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOK Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
AOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOK Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAOR vs. AOK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) and iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF (AOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EAORAOKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.41

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

2.70

+0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.04

11.50

+1.54

EAOR vs. AOK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAOR Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the AOK Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAOR and AOK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EAORAOKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

2.11

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.53

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.71

+0.16

Drawdowns

EAOR vs. AOK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAOR drawdown since its inception was -22.91%, which is greater than AOK's maximum drawdown of -18.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOR and AOK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EAORAOKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.91%

-18.94%

-3.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.62%

-4.50%

-2.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.28%

-6.37%

-3.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.91%

-18.94%

-3.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-0.41%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.05%

-2.37%

-2.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.50%

1.06%

+0.44%

Volatility

EAOR vs. AOK - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) has a higher volatility of 2.79% compared to iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF (AOK) at 1.97%. This indicates that EAOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AOK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EAORAOKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

1.97%

+0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.90%

4.47%

+2.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.55%

5.76%

+2.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.52%

7.10%

+3.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.39%

6.71%

+3.68%

EAOR vs. AOK - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAOR has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than AOK's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EAOR vs. AOK - Dividend Comparison

EAOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, less than AOK's 3.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AOK
iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF
3.28%3.28%3.23%2.93%2.25%1.55%2.10%2.71%2.68%2.91%2.14%2.02%
EAOR
iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF
2.34%2.45%2.52%2.39%1.99%1.39%1.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, EAOR and AOK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EAOR has higher volatility (2.79%) compared to AOK (1.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAOR dropped -22.91% vs AOK's -18.94%.

On 5-year performance, EAOR leads with 6.41% vs 3.71% for AOK. On fees, EAOR is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, AOK has been the lower-risk option at 1.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EAOR has performed better with a 6.41% return vs 3.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EAOR is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AOK.

AOK has the higher dividend yield at 3.28%, compared with 2.34% for EAOR.

EAOR tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Growth Allocation Index, while AOK tracks S&P Target Risk Conservative Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EAOR and 0.25% for AOK.

EAOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EAOR and AOK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer