PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EAOM vs. TSPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EAOM vs. TSPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) and Twin Oak Active Opportunities ETF (TSPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAOM achieves a 5.08% return, which is significantly lower than TSPX's 8.22% return.


EAOM

1D
-0.45%
1M
2.36%
YTD
5.08%
6M
5.24%
1Y
14.66%
3Y*
10.47%
5Y*
4.28%
10Y*

TSPX

1D
-0.51%
1M
4.02%
YTD
8.22%
6M
8.64%
1Y
21.31%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAOM vs. TSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EAOM and TSPX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2025

0.85

The correlation between EAOM and TSPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EAOM vs. TSPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAOM
EAOM Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
EAOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAOM Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
EAOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAOM Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

TSPX
TSPX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
TSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
TSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAOM vs. TSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) and Twin Oak Active Opportunities ETF (TSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EAOMTSPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.43

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

3.14

-0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.53

14.68

-2.14

EAOM vs. TSPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAOM Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the TSPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAOM and TSPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EAOMTSPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29

2.35

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

1.77

-1.02

Drawdowns

EAOM vs. TSPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAOM drawdown since its inception was -20.73%, which is greater than TSPX's maximum drawdown of -7.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOM and TSPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EAOMTSPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.73%

-7.80%

-12.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.17%

-6.81%

+1.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-0.51%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.97%

-1.18%

-3.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

1.46%

-0.29%

Volatility

EAOM vs. TSPX - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) and Twin Oak Active Opportunities ETF (TSPX) have volatilities of 2.31% and 2.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EAOMTSPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.31%

2.29%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.24%

7.08%

-1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.44%

9.13%

-2.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.07%

10.80%

-2.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.91%

10.80%

-2.89%

EAOM vs. TSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAOM has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than TSPX's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

EAOM vs. TSPX - Dividend Comparison

EAOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, more than TSPX's 1.99% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
EAOM
iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF
2.78%2.89%2.89%2.70%1.93%1.32%1.02%
TSPX
Twin Oak Active Opportunities ETF
1.99%2.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EAOM and TSPX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EAOM has higher volatility (2.31%) compared to TSPX (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAOM dropped -20.73% vs TSPX's -7.80%.

On 1-year performance, TSPX leads with 21.31% vs 14.66% for EAOM. On fees, EAOM is cheaper at 0.18% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSPX has performed better with a 21.31% return vs 14.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EAOM is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TSPX.

EAOM has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 1.99% for TSPX.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Twin Oak. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EAOM and 1.01% for TSPX.

TSPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EAOM and TSPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer