EAOM vs. SBIT
EAOM (iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF) and SBIT (Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EAOM is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the BlackRock ESG Aware Moderate Allocation Index, while SBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EAOM returned 10.68% vs 98.77% for SBIT. Their -0.39 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. EAOM charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SBIT.
Performance
EAOM vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EAOM achieves a 4.35% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 39.44% return.
EAOM
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- 6M
- 3.03%
- YTD
- 4.35%
- 1Y
- 10.68%
- 3Y*
- 9.51%
- 5Y*
- 3.84%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.68%
SBIT
- 1D
- 5.60%
- 1M
- -6.04%
- 6M
- 32.41%
- YTD
- 39.44%
- 1Y
- 98.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -42.65%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $28.79K | $99.12K | $53.82K | |
| $29.57M | $32.71M | $46.48M |
EAOM vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EAOM iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF | 4.35% | 12.90% | 5.01% |
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF | 39.44% | -25.11% | -73.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between EAOM and SBIT is -0.48, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024 | -0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EAOM vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank
EAOM
SBIT
EAOM vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EAOM | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.23 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | 2.35 | -0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.64 | 5.19 | +3.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EAOM vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAOM drawdown since its inception was -20.73%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOM and SBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EAOM | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.73% | -91.35% | +70.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.17% | -47.94% | +42.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.14% | -77.87% | +76.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.86% | -69.07% | +64.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.23% | 21.67% | -20.44% |
Volatility
EAOM vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) is 1.98%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 18.09%. This indicates that EAOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EAOM | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.98% | 18.09% | -16.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.87% | 67.10% | -61.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.95% | 88.65% | -81.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.17% | 96.10% | -87.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.91% | 96.10% | -88.19% |
EAOM vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
EAOM has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
EAOM vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison
EAOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, less than SBIT's 4.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAOM iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF | 2.89% | 2.89% | 2.89% | 2.70% | 1.93% | 1.32% | 1.02% |
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF | 4.03% | 0.52% | 1.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EAOM and SBIT have a correlation of -0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SBIT has higher volatility (18.09%) compared to EAOM (1.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAOM dropped -20.73% vs SBIT's -91.35%.
On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 98.77% vs 10.68% for EAOM. On fees, EAOM is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, EAOM has been the lower-risk option at 1.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 98.77% return vs 10.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EAOM is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SBIT.
SBIT has the higher dividend yield at 4.03%, compared with 2.89% for EAOM.
EAOM is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. EAOM tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Moderate Allocation Index, while SBIT tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EAOM and 0.95% for SBIT.
EAOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EAOM and SBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer