EAOM vs. PWS
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) and Pacer WealthShield ETF (PWS).
EAOM and PWS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EAOM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the BlackRock ESG Aware Moderate Allocation Index. It was launched on Jun 12, 2020. PWS is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer WealthShield Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2017. Both EAOM and PWS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EAOM vs. PWS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EAOM vs. PWS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAOM iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF | -0.98% | 12.90% | 7.29% | 11.83% | -15.48% | 6.39% | 10.30% |
PWS Pacer WealthShield ETF | -0.91% | 8.05% | 14.01% | -3.58% | -12.10% | 14.43% | 26.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EAOM achieves a -0.98% return, which is significantly lower than PWS's -0.91% return.
EAOM
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- -3.55%
- YTD
- -0.98%
- 6M
- 0.86%
- 1Y
- 10.87%
- 3Y*
- 8.56%
- 5Y*
- 3.60%
- 10Y*
- —
PWS
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -3.73%
- YTD
- -0.91%
- 6M
- 0.33%
- 1Y
- 5.43%
- 3Y*
- 7.38%
- 5Y*
- 1.86%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EAOM vs. PWS - Expense Ratio Comparison
EAOM has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than PWS's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EAOM vs. PWS — Risk / Return Rank
EAOM
PWS
EAOM vs. PWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) and Pacer WealthShield ETF (PWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EAOM | PWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.36 | 0.47 | +0.89 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.98 | 0.73 | +1.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.09 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | 1.03 | +0.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.22 | 2.75 | +5.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EAOM | PWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | 0.47 | +0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.15 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.31 | +0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between EAOM and PWS is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EAOM vs. PWS - Dividend Comparison
EAOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, more than PWS's 1.47% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAOM iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF | 2.92% | 2.89% | 2.89% | 2.70% | 1.93% | 1.32% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PWS Pacer WealthShield ETF | 1.47% | 1.59% | 1.33% | 2.21% | 1.45% | 0.94% | 0.53% | 1.77% | 1.16% |
Drawdowns
EAOM vs. PWS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAOM drawdown since its inception was -20.73%, smaller than the maximum PWS drawdown of -24.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOM and PWS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EAOM | PWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.73% | -24.93% | +4.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.67% | -6.15% | +0.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.73% | -24.93% | +4.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.67% | -4.70% | +1.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.09% | -9.20% | +4.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.34% | 2.31% | -0.97% |
Volatility
EAOM vs. PWS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) is 3.32%, while Pacer WealthShield ETF (PWS) has a volatility of 3.85%. This indicates that EAOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EAOM | PWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.32% | 3.85% | -0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.81% | 9.84% | -5.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.03% | 11.76% | -3.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.02% | 12.11% | -4.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.91% | 14.51% | -6.60% |