PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EAOM vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EAOM vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAOM achieves a 5.30% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 79.84% return.


EAOM

1D
0.21%
1M
2.02%
YTD
5.30%
6M
5.55%
1Y
14.38%
3Y*
10.61%
5Y*
4.32%
10Y*

DBO

1D
-2.66%
1M
-3.39%
YTD
79.84%
6M
74.51%
1Y
77.38%
3Y*
20.83%
5Y*
15.36%
10Y*
10.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAOM vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EAOM
iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF
5.30%12.90%7.29%11.83%-15.48%6.39%10.30%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
79.84%-11.71%7.85%-4.44%13.04%60.74%21.12%

Correlation

The correlation between EAOM and DBO is -0.38, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2020

0.06

The correlation between EAOM and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.38 (1 year) to 0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EAOM vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EAOM
DBO

Technology

30.2%

-

Financial Services

16.6%
116.0%

Industrials

11.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%

-

Healthcare

8.6%

-

Communication Services

8.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.4%

-

Energy

3.8%

-

Basic Materials

2.8%

-

Utilities

2.5%

-

Real Estate

2.3%

-

Technology

EAOM
30.2%
DBO

-

Financial Services

EAOM
16.6%
DBO
116.0%

Industrials

EAOM
11.0%
DBO

-

Consumer Cyclical

EAOM
9.5%
DBO

-

Healthcare

EAOM
8.6%
DBO

-

Communication Services

EAOM
8.3%
DBO

-

Consumer Defensive

EAOM
4.4%
DBO

-

Energy

EAOM
3.8%
DBO

-

Basic Materials

EAOM
2.8%
DBO

-

Utilities

EAOM
2.5%
DBO

-

Real Estate

EAOM
2.3%
DBO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EAOM vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAOM
EAOM Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
EAOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAOM Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
EAOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAOM Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAOM vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EAOMDBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.36

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

4.28

-1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.30

8.69

+3.61

EAOM vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAOM Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAOM and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EAOMDBODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

2.25

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.48

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.02

+0.74

Drawdowns

EAOM vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAOM drawdown since its inception was -20.73%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOM and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EAOMDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.73%

-90.18%

+69.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.17%

-18.19%

+13.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.63%

-28.20%

+20.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.73%

-37.68%

+16.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-52.68%

+52.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.96%

-62.25%

+57.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

8.94%

-7.77%

Volatility

EAOM vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) is 2.27%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.79%. This indicates that EAOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EAOMDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.27%

12.79%

-10.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.24%

28.32%

-23.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.44%

34.58%

-28.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.06%

32.31%

-24.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.90%

31.79%

-23.89%

EAOM vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAOM has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

EAOM vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

EAOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, more than DBO's 1.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
1.95%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%
EAOM
iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF
2.78%2.89%2.89%2.70%1.93%1.32%1.02%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EAOM and DBO have a correlation of -0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBO has higher volatility (12.79%) compared to EAOM (2.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAOM dropped -20.73% vs DBO's -90.18%.

On 5-year performance, DBO leads with 15.36% vs 4.32% for EAOM. On fees, EAOM is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, EAOM has been the lower-risk option at 2.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBO has performed better with a 15.36% return vs 4.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EAOM is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

EAOM has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 1.95% for DBO.

EAOM is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while DBO is Oil & Gas. EAOM tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Moderate Allocation Index, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EAOM and 0.78% for DBO.

DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EAOM and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer