PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EAOM vs. ASET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EAOM vs. ASET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) and FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


EAOM

1D
-0.45%
1M
2.36%
YTD
5.08%
6M
5.24%
1Y
14.66%
3Y*
10.47%
5Y*
4.28%
10Y*

ASET

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAOM vs. ASET - Yearly Performance Comparison


EAOM vs. ASET - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EAOM
ASET

Technology

30.2%
0.2%

Financial Services

16.6%

-

Industrials

11.0%
16.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
0.1%

Healthcare

8.6%
2.2%

Communication Services

8.3%
12.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
1.1%

Energy

3.8%
7.8%

Basic Materials

2.8%
5.8%

Utilities

2.5%
12.8%

Real Estate

2.3%
41.6%

Technology

EAOM
30.2%
ASET
0.2%

Financial Services

EAOM
16.6%
ASET

-

Industrials

EAOM
11.0%
ASET
16.3%

Consumer Cyclical

EAOM
9.5%
ASET
0.1%

Healthcare

EAOM
8.6%
ASET
2.2%

Communication Services

EAOM
8.3%
ASET
12.1%

Consumer Defensive

EAOM
4.4%
ASET
1.1%

Energy

EAOM
3.8%
ASET
7.8%

Basic Materials

EAOM
2.8%
ASET
5.8%

Utilities

EAOM
2.5%
ASET
12.8%

Real Estate

EAOM
2.3%
ASET
41.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EAOM vs. ASET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAOM
EAOM Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
EAOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAOM Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
EAOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAOM Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

ASET
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAOM vs. ASET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) and FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EAOMASETDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.53

EAOM vs. ASET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EAOMASETDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

Drawdowns

EAOM vs. ASET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAOM drawdown since its inception was -20.73%, which is greater than ASET's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOM and ASET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EAOMASETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.73%

0.00%

-20.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

0.00%

-0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.97%

0.00%

-4.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

Volatility

EAOM vs. ASET - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EAOMASETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.44%

0.00%

+6.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.07%

0.00%

+8.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.91%

0.00%

+7.91%

EAOM vs. ASET - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAOM has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than ASET's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

EAOM vs. ASET - Dividend Comparison

EAOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, while ASET has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
ASET
FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EAOM
iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF
2.78%2.89%2.89%2.70%1.93%1.32%1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, EAOM is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EAOM is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for ASET.

EAOM has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 0.00% for ASET.

EAOM tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Moderate Allocation Index, while ASET tracks Northern Trust Real Assets Allocation Total Return. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EAOM and 0.57% for ASET.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EAOM and ASET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer