EAOM vs. ASET
EAOM (iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF) and ASET (FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds - EAOM tracks the BlackRock ESG Aware Moderate Allocation Index while ASET tracks the Northern Trust Real Assets Allocation Total Return. Both are passively managed. EAOM charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for ASET.
Performance
EAOM vs. ASET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EAOM
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 2.36%
- YTD
- 5.08%
- 6M
- 5.24%
- 1Y
- 14.66%
- 3Y*
- 10.47%
- 5Y*
- 4.28%
- 10Y*
- —
ASET
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EAOM vs. ASET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EAOM iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF | 3.32% |
ASET FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund | 0.00% |
EAOM vs. ASET - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EAOM
ASET
Technology
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
EAOM
ASET
Financial Services
EAOM
ASET
-
Industrials
EAOM
ASET
Consumer Cyclical
EAOM
ASET
Healthcare
EAOM
ASET
Communication Services
EAOM
ASET
Consumer Defensive
EAOM
ASET
Energy
EAOM
ASET
Basic Materials
EAOM
ASET
Utilities
EAOM
ASET
Real Estate
EAOM
ASET
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EAOM vs. ASET — Risk / Return Rank
EAOM
ASET
EAOM vs. ASET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) and FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EAOM | ASET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.29 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.31 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.53 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EAOM | ASET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | — | — |
Drawdowns
EAOM vs. ASET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAOM drawdown since its inception was -20.73%, which is greater than ASET's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOM and ASET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EAOM | ASET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.73% | 0.00% | -20.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | 0.00% | -0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.97% | 0.00% | -4.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.17% | — | — |
Volatility
EAOM vs. ASET - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EAOM | ASET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.31% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.24% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.44% | 0.00% | +6.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.07% | 0.00% | +8.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.91% | 0.00% | +7.91% |
EAOM vs. ASET - Expense Ratio Comparison
EAOM has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than ASET's 0.57% expense ratio.
Dividends
EAOM vs. ASET - Dividend Comparison
EAOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, while ASET has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASET FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EAOM iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF | 2.78% | 2.89% | 2.89% | 2.70% | 1.93% | 1.32% | 1.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, EAOM is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EAOM is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for ASET.
EAOM has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 0.00% for ASET.
EAOM tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Moderate Allocation Index, while ASET tracks Northern Trust Real Assets Allocation Total Return. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EAOM and 0.57% for ASET.
Find the right allocation for EAOM and ASET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer