EAOM vs. ASET

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) and FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET).

EAOM and ASET are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EAOM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the BlackRock ESG Aware Moderate Allocation Index. It was launched on Jun 12, 2020. ASET is a passively managed fund by Northern Trust that tracks the performance of the Northern Trust Real Assets Allocation Total Return. It was launched on Nov 23, 2015. Both EAOM and ASET are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

EAOM vs. ASET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) and FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EAOM vs. ASET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
EAOM iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF	-2.63%
ASET FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund	0.00%

Returns By Period

EAOM

• 1D: 1.38%
• 1M: -3.55%
• YTD: -0.98%
• 6M: 0.86%
• 1Y: 10.87%
• 3Y*: 8.56%
• 5Y*: 3.60%
• 10Y*: —

ASET

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAOM vs. ASET - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAOM has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than ASET's 0.57% expense ratio.

ASET

FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund

EAOM

iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF

Return for Risk

EAOM vs. ASET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAOM

EAOM Risk / Return Rank: 76
EAOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
EAOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
EAOM Omega Ratio Rank: 76
EAOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
EAOM Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAOM vs. ASET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) and FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EAOM	ASET	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.94	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.22	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EAOM	ASET	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.36	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	—	—

Dividends

EAOM vs. ASET - Dividend Comparison

EAOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, while ASET has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EAOM iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF	2.92%	2.89%	2.89%	2.70%	1.93%	1.32%	1.02%
ASET FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

EAOM vs. ASET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAOM drawdown since its inception was -20.73%, which is greater than ASET's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOM and ASET.

Drawdown Indicators

	EAOM	ASET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.73%	0.00%	-20.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.67%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.67%	0.00%	-3.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.09%	0.00%	-5.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.34%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EAOM	ASET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.32%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.81%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.03%	0.00%	+8.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.02%	0.00%	+8.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.91%	0.00%	+7.91%