EAOK vs. LCO
EAOK (iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF) and LCO (LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. EAOK is passively managed, while LCO is actively managed. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EAOK charges 0.18%/yr vs 1.13%/yr for LCO.
Performance
EAOK vs. LCO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EAOK
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -0.80%
- 6M
- 2.04%
- YTD
- 3.09%
- 1Y
- 8.43%
- 3Y*
- 8.07%
- 5Y*
- 2.74%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.17%
LCO
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- 6M
- -3.22%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.40K | $12.79K | $19.89K | |
| $390.19 | $330.48 | $1.34K |
EAOK vs. LCO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EAOK iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF | 2.37% |
LCO LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF | 2.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between EAOK and LCO is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2026 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EAOK vs. LCO — Risk / Return Rank
EAOK
LCO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EAOK vs. LCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF (EAOK) and LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF (LCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EAOK | LCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.10 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EAOK vs. LCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAOK drawdown since its inception was -19.91%, which is greater than LCO's maximum drawdown of -14.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOK and LCO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EAOK | LCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.91% | -14.32% | -5.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.18% | -11.22% | +10.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.91% | -5.46% | +0.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.06% | — | — |
Volatility
EAOK vs. LCO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EAOK | LCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.73% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.00% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.89% | 25.67% | -19.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.13% | 25.67% | -18.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.83% | 25.67% | -18.84% |
EAOK vs. LCO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EAOK has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than LCO's 1.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
EAOK vs. LCO - Dividend Comparison
EAOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, while LCO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAOK iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF | 3.21% | 3.18% | 3.15% | 2.80% | 2.27% | 1.19% | 1.00% |
LCO LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EAOK and LCO have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EAOK is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EAOK is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for LCO.
EAOK has the higher dividend yield at 3.21%, compared with 0.00% for LCO.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and LOGIQ. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EAOK and 1.13% for LCO.
Find the right allocation for EAOK and LCO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer