PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EAOK vs. CTAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EAOK vs. CTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF (EAOK) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EAOK vs. CTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAOK achieves a -0.71% return, which is significantly lower than CTAP's 5.36% return.


EAOK

1D
1.12%
1M
-3.10%
YTD
-0.71%
6M
0.92%
1Y
9.27%
3Y*
7.29%
5Y*
2.73%
10Y*

CTAP

1D
1.18%
1M
-5.40%
YTD
5.36%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EAOK vs. CTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAOK has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than CTAP's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

EAOK vs. CTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAOK
EAOK Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
EAOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAOK Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
EAOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAOK Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

CTAP
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAOK vs. CTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF (EAOK) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EAOKCTAPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.37

EAOK vs. CTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EAOKCTAPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

1.31

-0.76

Correlation

The correlation between EAOK and CTAP is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

EAOK vs. CTAP - Dividend Comparison

EAOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, more than CTAP's 0.75% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
EAOK
iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF
3.24%3.18%3.15%2.80%2.27%1.19%1.00%
CTAP
Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF
0.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EAOK vs. CTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAOK drawdown since its inception was -19.91%, which is greater than CTAP's maximum drawdown of -9.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOK and CTAP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EAOKCTAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.91%

-9.02%

-10.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.10%

-5.64%

+2.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.15%

-2.15%

-3.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

Volatility

EAOK vs. CTAP - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EAOKCTAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.50%

22.12%

-15.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.99%

22.12%

-15.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.83%

22.12%

-15.29%