EALT vs. XAPR

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

EALT (Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly) and XAPR (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EALT returned 10.43% vs 8.25% for XAPR. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. EALT charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for XAPR.

Performance

EALT vs. XAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EALT) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EALT achieves a 3.77% return, which is significantly lower than XAPR's 4.96% return.

EALT

• 1D: 1.02%
• 1M: 2.58%
• 6M: 2.58%
• YTD: 3.77%
• 1Y: 10.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.42%

XAPR

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 1.33%
• 6M: 4.55%
• YTD: 4.96%
• 1Y: 8.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EALT Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly	$756.56K	$656.28K	$795.95K
XAPR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April	$39.50K	$50.65K	$192.30K

EALT vs. XAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EALT Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly	3.77%	9.45%	15.78%
XAPR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April	4.96%	12.57%	8.57%

Correlation

The correlation between EALT and XAPR is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2024	0.81

The correlation between EALT and XAPR shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EALT vs. XAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EALT

EALT Risk / Return Rank: 46
EALT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
EALT Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
EALT Omega Ratio Rank: 51
EALT Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
EALT Martin Ratio Rank: 46

XAPR

XAPR Risk / Return Rank: 97
XAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
XAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
XAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 97
XAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
XAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EALT vs. XAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EALT) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EALT	XAPR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	3.16	-1.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.92	4.79	-2.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.75	-0.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.57	6.51	-4.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.90	38.05	-32.15

EALT vs. XAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EALT Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the XAPR Sharpe Ratio of 3.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EALT and XAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EALT vs. XAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EALT drawdown since its inception was -14.76%, which is greater than XAPR's maximum drawdown of -6.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EALT and XAPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	EALT	XAPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.76%	-6.18%	-8.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.66%	-1.27%	-5.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.58%	-0.19%	-1.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.77%	0.22%	+1.55%

Volatility

EALT vs. XAPR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EALT) has a higher volatility of 2.67% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) at 1.28%. This indicates that EALT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EALT	XAPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.67%	1.28%	+1.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.26%	2.34%	+2.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.66%	2.64%	+5.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.90%	6.09%	+3.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.90%	6.09%	+3.81%

EALT vs. XAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

EALT has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than XAPR's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

EALT vs. XAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither EALT nor XAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EALT and XAPR in my portfolio?

EALT and XAPR have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EALT or XAPR?

EALT has higher volatility (2.67%) compared to XAPR (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EALT dropped -14.76% vs XAPR's -6.18%.

Which ETF is better, EALT or XAPR?

On 1-year performance, EALT leads with 10.43% vs 8.25% for XAPR. On fees, EALT is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, XAPR has been the lower-risk option at 1.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EALT or XAPR?

Over the 1-year period, EALT has performed better with a 10.43% return vs 8.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EALT or XAPR?

EALT is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XAPR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EALT or XAPR?

EALT and XAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between EALT and XAPR?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for EALT and 0.85% for XAPR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.