EALT vs. BALT

In the year-to-date period, EALT achieves a -0.94% return, which is significantly lower than BALT's 1.46% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Both EALT and BALT have an expense ratio of 0.69%.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EALT) and Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current EALT Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the BALT Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EALT and BALT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither EALT nor BALT has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum EALT drawdown since its inception was -14.76%, which is greater than BALT's maximum drawdown of -4.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EALT and BALT.

Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EALT) has a higher volatility of 2.69% compared to Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT) at 0.74%. This indicates that EALT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BALT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.