PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EALT vs. HELO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EALT vs. HELO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EALT) and JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EALT vs. HELO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
EALT
Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly
-4.36%9.45%18.02%6.80%
HELO
JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF
-3.37%7.82%18.05%6.06%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EALT achieves a -4.36% return, which is significantly lower than HELO's -3.37% return.


EALT

1D
0.48%
1M
-5.23%
YTD
-4.36%
6M
-2.54%
1Y
9.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HELO

1D
0.33%
1M
-3.72%
YTD
-3.37%
6M
-1.18%
1Y
7.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EALT vs. HELO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EALT has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than HELO's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EALT vs. HELO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EALT
EALT Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
EALT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EALT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
EALT Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
EALT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
EALT Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

HELO
HELO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
HELO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HELO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
HELO Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
HELO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
HELO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EALT vs. HELO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EALT) and JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EALTHELODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.81

0.93

-0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.22

1.39

-0.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.20

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

1.42

-0.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.38

5.66

-0.28

EALT vs. HELO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EALT Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is comparable to the HELO Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EALT and HELO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EALTHELODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

0.93

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.14

1.40

-0.26

Correlation

The correlation between EALT and HELO is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

EALT vs. HELO - Dividend Comparison

EALT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HELO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%.


Drawdowns

EALT vs. HELO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EALT drawdown since its inception was -14.76%, which is greater than HELO's maximum drawdown of -10.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EALT and HELO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EALTHELODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.76%

-10.89%

-3.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.01%

-5.76%

-2.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.02%

-4.58%

-1.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.61%

-1.22%

-0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

1.44%

+0.38%

Volatility

EALT vs. HELO - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EALT) and JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO) have volatilities of 2.70% and 2.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EALTHELODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.70%

2.67%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.51%

5.39%

+1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.74%

8.58%

+3.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.36%

8.13%

+2.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.36%

8.13%

+2.23%