EALT vs. PJUL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EALT (Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly) and PJUL (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July) are both exchange-traded funds - EALT is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while PJUL is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index July. EALT is actively managed, while PJUL is passively managed. Over the past year, EALT returned 10.22% vs 14.31% for PJUL. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EALT charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for PJUL.

Performance

EALT vs. PJUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EALT) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EALT achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly lower than PJUL's 4.80% return.

EALT

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.58%
• YTD: 1.32%
• 6M: 0.35%
• 1Y: 10.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PJUL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: 4.80%
• 6M: 4.60%
• 1Y: 14.31%
• 3Y*: 13.24%
• 5Y*: 10.43%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EALT vs. PJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
EALT Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly	1.32%	9.45%	18.02%	6.68%
PJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July	4.80%	12.78%	13.76%	7.39%

Correlation

The correlation between EALT and PJUL is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023	0.88

The correlation between EALT and PJUL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EALT vs. PJUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EALT

EALT Risk / Return Rank: 39
EALT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
EALT Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
EALT Omega Ratio Rank: 43
EALT Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
EALT Martin Ratio Rank: 40

PJUL

PJUL Risk / Return Rank: 90
PJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
PJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
PJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 93
PJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
PJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EALT vs. PJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EALT) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EALT	PJUL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.39	2.82	-1.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	4.28	-2.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.61	-0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.54	3.94	-2.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.81	22.20	-16.38

EALT vs. PJUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EALT Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the PJUL Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EALT and PJUL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EALT vs. PJUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EALT drawdown since its inception was -14.76%, smaller than the maximum PJUL drawdown of -18.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EALT and PJUL.

Drawdown Indicators

	EALT	PJUL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.76%	-18.17%	+3.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.66%	-3.64%	-3.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-10.69%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-10.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.43%	-0.14%	-0.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.62%	-1.46%	-0.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.76%	0.65%	+1.11%

Volatility

EALT vs. PJUL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EALT) is 0.55%, while Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) has a volatility of 0.65%. This indicates that EALT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PJUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EALT	PJUL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.55%	0.65%	-0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.17%	3.87%	+1.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.41%	5.22%	+2.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.97%	8.61%	+1.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.97%	10.00%	-0.03%

EALT vs. PJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EALT has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than PJUL's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

EALT vs. PJUL - Dividend Comparison

Neither EALT nor PJUL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
EALT Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.82%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EALT and PJUL in my portfolio?

EALT and PJUL have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EALT or PJUL?

PJUL has higher volatility (0.65%) compared to EALT (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EALT dropped -14.76% vs PJUL's -18.17%.

Which ETF is better, EALT or PJUL?

On 1-year performance, PJUL leads with 14.31% vs 10.22% for EALT. On fees, EALT is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, EALT has been the lower-risk option at 0.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EALT or PJUL?

Over the 1-year period, PJUL has performed better with a 14.31% return vs 10.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EALT or PJUL?

EALT is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for PJUL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EALT or PJUL?

EALT and PJUL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between EALT and PJUL?

EALT is categorized as Options Trading, while PJUL is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for EALT and 0.79% for PJUL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.