EALT vs. FLJJ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EALT (Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly) and FLJJ (Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EALT returned 10.95% vs 15.29% for FLJJ. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EALT charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for FLJJ.

Performance

EALT vs. FLJJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EALT) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EALT achieves a 1.05% return, which is significantly lower than FLJJ's 4.98% return.

EALT

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 1.42%
• YTD: 1.05%
• 6M: 0.88%
• 1Y: 10.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLJJ

• 1D: -0.00%
• 1M: 1.88%
• YTD: 4.98%
• 6M: 5.80%
• 1Y: 15.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EALT vs. FLJJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EALT Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly	1.05%	9.45%	15.65%
FLJJ Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF	4.98%	11.35%	14.19%

Correlation

The correlation between EALT and FLJJ is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2024	0.89

The correlation between EALT and FLJJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

EALT vs. FLJJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EALT	FLJJ
Technology	33.6%	36.2%
Financial Services	12.2%	11.9%
Communication Services	10.5%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	10.1%
Healthcare	9.5%	8.4%
Industrials	8.5%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	5.3%	4.9%
Energy	4.0%	3.5%
Utilities	2.6%	2.3%
Real Estate	2.0%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.9%	1.8%

Return for Risk

EALT vs. FLJJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EALT

EALT Risk / Return Rank: 40
EALT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
EALT Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
EALT Omega Ratio Rank: 43
EALT Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
EALT Martin Ratio Rank: 40

FLJJ

FLJJ Risk / Return Rank: 89
FLJJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
FLJJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
FLJJ Omega Ratio Rank: 93
FLJJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
FLJJ Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EALT vs. FLJJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EALT) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EALT	FLJJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.48	3.02	-1.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.03	4.67	-2.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.65	-0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.65	3.98	-2.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.25	20.87	-14.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EALT vs. FLJJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EALT Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the FLJJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EALT and FLJJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EALT	FLJJ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.48	3.02	-1.54
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.33	2.14	-0.81

Drawdowns

EALT vs. FLJJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EALT drawdown since its inception was -14.76%, which is greater than FLJJ's maximum drawdown of -6.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EALT and FLJJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	EALT	FLJJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.76%	-6.91%	-7.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.66%	-3.86%	-2.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.70%	-0.05%	-0.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.64%	-0.78%	-0.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.76%	0.73%	+1.03%

Volatility

EALT vs. FLJJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EALT) is 0.46%, while Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ) has a volatility of 0.86%. This indicates that EALT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLJJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EALT	FLJJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.46%	0.86%	-0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.51%	3.59%	+1.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.45%	5.10%	+2.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.07%	6.21%	+3.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.07%	6.21%	+3.86%

EALT vs. FLJJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EALT has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than FLJJ's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

EALT vs. FLJJ - Dividend Comparison

Neither EALT nor FLJJ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EALT and FLJJ in my portfolio?

EALT and FLJJ have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EALT or FLJJ?

FLJJ has higher volatility (0.86%) compared to EALT (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EALT dropped -14.76% vs FLJJ's -6.91%.

Which ETF is better, EALT or FLJJ?

On 1-year performance, FLJJ leads with 15.29% vs 10.95% for EALT. On fees, EALT is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, EALT has been the lower-risk option at 0.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EALT or FLJJ?

Over the 1-year period, FLJJ has performed better with a 15.29% return vs 10.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EALT or FLJJ?

EALT is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for FLJJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EALT or FLJJ?

EALT and FLJJ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between EALT and FLJJ?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Allianz. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for EALT and 0.74% for FLJJ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLJJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.