EALT vs. FFTY
EALT (Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly) and FFTY (CapForce IBD 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EALT is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while FFTY is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the IBD 50 Index. EALT is actively managed, while FFTY is passively managed. Over the past year, EALT returned 10.43% vs 12.12% for FFTY. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EALT charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FFTY.
Performance
EALT vs. FFTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EALT achieves a 3.77% return, which is significantly lower than FFTY's 9.28% return.
EALT
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- 2.58%
- 6M
- 2.58%
- YTD
- 3.77%
- 1Y
- 10.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.42%
FFTY
- 1D
- 2.48%
- 1M
- -6.44%
- 6M
- 3.01%
- YTD
- 9.28%
- 1Y
- 12.12%
- 3Y*
- 16.47%
- 5Y*
- -2.86%
- 10Y*
- 5.74%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.30%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $756.56K | $656.28K | $795.95K | |
| $885.01K | $1.10M | $1.50M |
EALT vs. FFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EALT Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly | 3.77% | 9.45% | 18.02% | 6.68% |
FFTY CapForce IBD 50 ETF | 9.28% | 23.38% | 18.36% | 9.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between EALT and FFTY is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023 | 0.68 |
The correlation between EALT and FFTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EALT vs. FFTY — Risk / Return Rank
EALT
FFTY
EALT vs. FFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EALT) and CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EALT | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.09 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 0.52 | +1.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.90 | 1.27 | +4.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EALT vs. FFTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EALT drawdown since its inception was -14.76%, smaller than the maximum FFTY drawdown of -59.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EALT and FFTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EALT | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.76% | -59.46% | +44.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.66% | -23.29% | +16.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -59.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -22.98% | +22.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.58% | -22.32% | +20.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.77% | 9.60% | -7.83% |
Volatility
EALT vs. FFTY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EALT) is 2.67%, while CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) has a volatility of 7.82%. This indicates that EALT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EALT | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.67% | 7.82% | -5.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.26% | 28.27% | -23.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.66% | 36.43% | -28.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.90% | 29.77% | -19.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.90% | 27.81% | -17.91% |
EALT vs. FFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
EALT has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than FFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
EALT vs. FFTY - Dividend Comparison
EALT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EALT Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FFTY CapForce IBD 50 ETF | 1.23% | 1.35% | 0.91% | 0.65% | 2.75% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EALT and FFTY have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FFTY has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to EALT (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EALT dropped -14.76% vs FFTY's -59.46%.
On 1-year performance, FFTY leads with 12.12% vs 10.43% for EALT. On fees, EALT is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, EALT has been the lower-risk option at 2.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FFTY has performed better with a 12.12% return vs 10.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EALT is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFTY.
FFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.00% for EALT.
EALT is categorized as Options Trading, while FFTY is Mid Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and CapForce. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for EALT and 0.80% for FFTY.
EALT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EALT and FFTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer