PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EALT vs. AMZY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EALT vs. AMZY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EALT) and YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EALT achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly higher than AMZY's -1.83% return.


EALT

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.58%
YTD
1.32%
6M
0.35%
1Y
10.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMZY

1D
0.57%
1M
-10.29%
YTD
-1.83%
6M
-1.84%
1Y
6.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EALT vs. AMZY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
EALT
Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly
1.32%9.45%18.02%6.68%
AMZY
YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF
-1.83%10.39%35.28%17.11%

Correlation

The correlation between EALT and AMZY is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023

0.61

The correlation between EALT and AMZY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EALT vs. AMZY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EALT
EALT Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
EALT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EALT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
EALT Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
EALT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
EALT Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

AMZY
AMZY Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
AMZY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZY Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZY Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EALT vs. AMZY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EALT) and YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EALTAMZYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.07

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

0.35

+1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.81

0.83

+4.98

EALT vs. AMZY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EALT Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is higher than the AMZY Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EALT and AMZY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EALT vs. AMZY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EALT drawdown since its inception was -14.76%, smaller than the maximum AMZY drawdown of -23.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EALT and AMZY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EALTAMZYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.76%

-23.70%

+8.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.66%

-19.61%

+12.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

-12.34%

+11.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.62%

-5.40%

+3.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

8.20%

-6.44%

Volatility

EALT vs. AMZY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EALT) is 0.55%, while YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY) has a volatility of 7.99%. This indicates that EALT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMZY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EALTAMZYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.55%

7.99%

-7.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.17%

17.06%

-11.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.41%

24.24%

-16.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.97%

25.14%

-15.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.97%

25.14%

-15.17%

EALT vs. AMZY - Expense Ratio Comparison

EALT has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than AMZY's 1.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

EALT vs. AMZY - Dividend Comparison

EALT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMZY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 58.30%.


PositionTTM202520242023
AMZY
YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF
58.30%52.59%47.91%9.90%
EALT
Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EALT and AMZY have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMZY has higher volatility (7.99%) compared to EALT (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EALT dropped -14.76% vs AMZY's -23.70%.

On 1-year performance, EALT leads with 10.22% vs 6.82% for AMZY. On fees, EALT is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, EALT has been the lower-risk option at 0.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EALT has performed better with a 10.22% return vs 6.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EALT is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for AMZY.

AMZY has the higher dividend yield at 58.30%, compared with 0.00% for EALT.

EALT is categorized as Options Trading, while AMZY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for EALT and 1.09% for AMZY.

EALT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EALT and AMZY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer