PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EALT vs. AAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EALT vs. AAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EALT) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EALT achieves a 1.05% return, which is significantly lower than AAPR's 3.82% return.


EALT

1D
0.11%
1M
1.42%
YTD
1.05%
6M
0.88%
1Y
10.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AAPR

1D
-0.14%
1M
0.68%
YTD
3.82%
6M
4.48%
1Y
9.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EALT vs. AAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EALT and AAPR is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

0.82

The correlation between EALT and AAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EALT vs. AAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EALT
EALT Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
EALT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EALT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
EALT Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
EALT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
EALT Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPR
AAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
AAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EALT vs. AAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EALT) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EALTAAPRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.99

-0.71

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

12.12

-10.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.25

62.99

-56.74

EALT vs. AAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EALT Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the AAPR Sharpe Ratio of 4.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EALT and AAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EALTAAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

4.18

-2.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.33

1.73

-0.41

Drawdowns

EALT vs. AAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EALT drawdown since its inception was -14.76%, which is greater than AAPR's maximum drawdown of -5.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EALT and AAPR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EALTAAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.76%

-5.99%

-8.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.66%

-0.81%

-5.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-0.15%

-0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.64%

-0.45%

-1.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

0.16%

+1.60%

Volatility

EALT vs. AAPR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EALT) is 0.46%, while Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR) has a volatility of 0.68%. This indicates that EALT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EALTAAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.46%

0.68%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.51%

1.57%

+3.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.45%

2.36%

+5.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.07%

4.81%

+5.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.07%

4.81%

+5.26%

EALT vs. AAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

EALT has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than AAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

EALT vs. AAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither EALT nor AAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


EALT and AAPR have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AAPR has higher volatility (0.68%) compared to EALT (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EALT dropped -14.76% vs AAPR's -5.99%.

On 1-year performance, EALT leads with 10.95% vs 9.83% for AAPR. On fees, EALT is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, EALT has been the lower-risk option at 0.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EALT has performed better with a 10.95% return vs 9.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EALT is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for AAPR.

EALT and AAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Their fees differ too: 0.69% for EALT and 0.79% for AAPR.

AAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.18 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EALT and AAPR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer