PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EAGL vs. NXTE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EAGL vs. NXTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eagle Capital Select Equity ETF (EAGL) and Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAGL achieves a 3.20% return, which is significantly lower than NXTE's 25.08% return.


EAGL

1D
0.90%
1M
3.33%
6M
-0.98%
YTD
3.20%
1Y
10.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NXTE

1D
-4.09%
1M
-4.21%
6M
15.70%
YTD
25.08%
1Y
37.76%
3Y*
13.59%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAGL vs. NXTE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EAGL
Eagle Capital Select Equity ETF
3.20%17.19%11.23%
NXTE
Axs Green Alpha ETF
25.08%21.84%-2.95%

Correlation

The correlation between EAGL and NXTE is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2024

0.61

The correlation between EAGL and NXTE shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EAGL vs. NXTE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EAGL
NXTE

Technology

22.4%
53.6%

Financial Services

22.2%
1.3%

Healthcare

18.1%
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

17.4%
3.7%

Communication Services

8.2%
1.6%

Energy

7.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.1%
1.8%

Basic Materials

1.6%
0.5%

Industrials

0.3%
15.7%

Real Estate

-

10.1%

Utilities

-

2.1%

Technology

EAGL
22.4%
NXTE
53.6%

Financial Services

EAGL
22.2%
NXTE
1.3%

Healthcare

EAGL
18.1%
NXTE
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

EAGL
17.4%
NXTE
3.7%

Communication Services

EAGL
8.2%
NXTE
1.6%

Energy

EAGL
7.5%
NXTE

-

Consumer Defensive

EAGL
2.1%
NXTE
1.8%

Basic Materials

EAGL
1.6%
NXTE
0.5%

Industrials

EAGL
0.3%
NXTE
15.7%

Real Estate

EAGL

-

NXTE
10.1%

Utilities

EAGL

-

NXTE
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EAGL vs. NXTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAGL
EAGL Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
EAGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAGL Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
EAGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAGL Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

NXTE
NXTE Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
NXTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NXTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
NXTE Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
NXTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
NXTE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAGL vs. NXTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eagle Capital Select Equity ETF (EAGL) and Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EAGLNXTEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.23

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.81

2.77

-1.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.60

8.15

-5.56

EAGL vs. NXTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAGL Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the NXTE Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAGL and NXTE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EAGL vs. NXTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAGL drawdown since its inception was -15.09%, smaller than the maximum NXTE drawdown of -28.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAGL and NXTE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EAGLNXTEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.09%

-28.64%

+13.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.54%

-13.68%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.98%

-11.67%

+10.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.65%

-7.79%

+5.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.21%

4.64%

-0.43%

Volatility

EAGL vs. NXTE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eagle Capital Select Equity ETF (EAGL) is 4.53%, while Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) has a volatility of 14.05%. This indicates that EAGL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NXTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EAGLNXTEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.53%

14.05%

-9.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.71%

24.78%

-14.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.72%

29.17%

-15.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.44%

26.99%

-11.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.44%

26.99%

-11.55%

EAGL vs. NXTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAGL has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than NXTE's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

EAGL vs. NXTE - Dividend Comparison

EAGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, which matches NXTE's 0.53% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
EAGL
Eagle Capital Select Equity ETF
0.53%0.55%0.29%0.00%0.00%
NXTE
Axs Green Alpha ETF
0.53%0.36%0.52%0.76%0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


EAGL and NXTE have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NXTE has higher volatility (14.05%) compared to EAGL (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAGL dropped -15.09% vs NXTE's -28.64%.

On 1-year performance, NXTE leads with 37.76% vs 10.91% for EAGL. On fees, EAGL is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, EAGL has been the lower-risk option at 4.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NXTE has performed better with a 37.76% return vs 10.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EAGL is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for NXTE.

EAGL and NXTE have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.53%.

They also come from different issuers: Eagle Capital and AXS. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for EAGL and 1.00% for NXTE.

NXTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EAGL and NXTE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer