PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
E61Z.DE vs. XB0T.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

E61Z.DE vs. XB0T.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (E61Z.DE) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (XB0T.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, E61Z.DE achieves a -14.62% return, which is significantly lower than XB0T.DE's 9.32% return.


E61Z.DE

1D
1.36%
1M
0.05%
YTD
-14.62%
6M
-13.76%
1Y
-9.72%
3Y*
14.61%
5Y*
10Y*

XB0T.DE

1D
-1.11%
1M
3.07%
YTD
9.32%
6M
9.11%
1Y
25.43%
3Y*
9.35%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

E61Z.DE vs. XB0T.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
E61Z.DE
Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
-14.62%7.18%37.44%27.85%-36.99%-14.47%
XB0T.DE
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
9.32%1.92%19.22%35.76%-39.42%-6.37%

Correlation

The correlation between E61Z.DE and XB0T.DE is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2021

0.68

The correlation between E61Z.DE and XB0T.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

E61Z.DE vs. XB0T.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

E61Z.DE
E61Z.DE Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
E61Z.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
E61Z.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
E61Z.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
E61Z.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
E61Z.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

XB0T.DE
XB0T.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
XB0T.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XB0T.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
XB0T.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
XB0T.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
XB0T.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

E61Z.DE vs. XB0T.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (E61Z.DE) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (XB0T.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


E61Z.DEXB0T.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.20

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.38

1.58

-1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.76

4.90

-5.66

E61Z.DE vs. XB0T.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current E61Z.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.50, which is lower than the XB0T.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of E61Z.DE and XB0T.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


E61Z.DEXB0T.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.50

1.09

-1.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.11

0.02

-0.13

Drawdowns

E61Z.DE vs. XB0T.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum E61Z.DE drawdown since its inception was -49.16%, which is greater than XB0T.DE's maximum drawdown of -45.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for E61Z.DE and XB0T.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


E61Z.DEXB0T.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.16%

-45.53%

-3.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.19%

-16.02%

-9.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.13%

-32.80%

+2.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.27%

-2.44%

-18.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.70%

-20.95%

-4.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.75%

5.18%

+7.57%

Volatility

E61Z.DE vs. XB0T.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (E61Z.DE) is 4.55%, while Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (XB0T.DE) has a volatility of 7.63%. This indicates that E61Z.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XB0T.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


E61Z.DEXB0T.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.55%

7.63%

-3.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.51%

17.40%

-2.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.25%

23.27%

-4.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.20%

26.05%

+1.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.20%

26.05%

+1.15%

E61Z.DE vs. XB0T.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both E61Z.DE and XB0T.DE have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

E61Z.DE vs. XB0T.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither E61Z.DE nor XB0T.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


E61Z.DE and XB0T.DE have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

E61Z.DE and XB0T.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

E61Z.DE is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while XB0T.DE is Robotics. E61Z.DE tracks Solactive E-commerce, while XB0T.DE tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic v2 Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for E61Z.DE and XB0T.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer