PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XB0T.DE vs. IBOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XB0T.DE vs. IBOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (XB0T.DE) and VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XB0T.DE is traded in EUR, while IBOT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IBOT values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XB0T.DE achieves a 9.32% return, which is significantly lower than IBOT's 29.50% return.


XB0T.DE

1D
-1.11%
1M
3.07%
YTD
9.32%
6M
9.11%
1Y
25.43%
3Y*
9.35%
5Y*
10Y*

IBOT

1D
0.10%
1M
7.74%
YTD
29.50%
6M
28.18%
1Y
53.70%
3Y*
20.20%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XB0T.DE vs. IBOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XB0T.DE
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
9.32%1.92%19.22%16.30%
IBOT
VanEck Robotics ETF
29.50%13.31%13.42%17.64%

Correlation

The correlation between XB0T.DE and IBOT is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2023

0.64

The correlation between XB0T.DE and IBOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XB0T.DE vs. IBOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XB0T.DE
XB0T.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
XB0T.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XB0T.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
XB0T.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
XB0T.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
XB0T.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

IBOT
IBOT Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
IBOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBOT Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
IBOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XB0T.DE vs. IBOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (XB0T.DE) and VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XB0T.DEIBOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.43

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

3.80

-2.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.90

15.00

-10.11

XB0T.DE vs. IBOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XB0T.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the IBOT Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XB0T.DE and IBOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XB0T.DEIBOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

2.58

-1.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

1.09

-1.07

Drawdowns

XB0T.DE vs. IBOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XB0T.DE drawdown since its inception was -45.53%, which is greater than IBOT's maximum drawdown of -26.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XB0T.DE and IBOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XB0T.DEIBOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.53%

-26.60%

-18.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.02%

-14.22%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.80%

-26.60%

-6.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.44%

0.00%

-2.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.95%

-4.89%

-16.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.18%

3.59%

+1.59%

Volatility

XB0T.DE vs. IBOT - Volatility Comparison

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (XB0T.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.63% compared to VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT) at 6.34%. This indicates that XB0T.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XB0T.DEIBOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.63%

6.34%

+1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.40%

16.33%

+1.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.27%

20.95%

+2.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.05%

21.88%

+4.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.05%

21.88%

+4.17%

XB0T.DE vs. IBOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XB0T.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IBOT's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

XB0T.DE vs. IBOT - Dividend Comparison

XB0T.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBOT
VanEck Robotics ETF
0.30%0.38%2.81%2.06%
XB0T.DE
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XB0T.DE and IBOT have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBOT is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBOT is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XB0T.DE.

XB0T.DE is categorized as Robotics, while IBOT is Technology Equities. XB0T.DE tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic v2 Index, while IBOT tracks BlueStar® Robotics Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XB0T.DE and 0.47% for IBOT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XB0T.DE and IBOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer