E61Z.DE vs. XDWS.DE
E61Z.DE (Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and XDWS.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - E61Z.DE tracks the Solactive E-commerce while XDWS.DE tracks the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, E61Z.DE returned 14.61%/yr vs 3.32%/yr for XDWS.DE. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. E61Z.DE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWS.DE.
Performance
E61Z.DE vs. XDWS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, E61Z.DE achieves a -14.62% return, which is significantly lower than XDWS.DE's 4.43% return.
E61Z.DE
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- -14.62%
- 6M
- -13.76%
- 1Y
- -9.72%
- 3Y*
- 14.61%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDWS.DE
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -1.84%
- YTD
- 4.43%
- 6M
- 4.20%
- 1Y
- -0.89%
- 3Y*
- 3.32%
- 5Y*
- 4.93%
- 10Y*
- 5.34%
E61Z.DE vs. XDWS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E61Z.DE Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | -14.62% | 7.18% | 37.44% | 27.85% | -36.99% | -14.47% |
XDWS.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C | 4.43% | -3.34% | 12.56% | -1.53% | -0.06% | 4.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between E61Z.DE and XDWS.DE is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2021 | 0.18 |
The correlation between E61Z.DE and XDWS.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
E61Z.DE vs. XDWS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
E61Z.DE
XDWS.DE
E61Z.DE vs. XDWS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (E61Z.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C (XDWS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| E61Z.DE | XDWS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.00 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.38 | -0.10 | -0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.76 | -0.20 | -0.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| E61Z.DE | XDWS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.50 | -0.07 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.11 | 0.45 | -0.56 |
Drawdowns
E61Z.DE vs. XDWS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum E61Z.DE drawdown since its inception was -49.16%, which is greater than XDWS.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for E61Z.DE and XDWS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| E61Z.DE | XDWS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.16% | -22.95% | -26.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.19% | -8.78% | -16.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.13% | -11.90% | -18.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -12.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.27% | -7.60% | -13.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.70% | -5.04% | -20.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.75% | 4.34% | +8.41% |
Volatility
E61Z.DE vs. XDWS.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (E61Z.DE) is 4.55%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C (XDWS.DE) has a volatility of 5.00%. This indicates that E61Z.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| E61Z.DE | XDWS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.55% | 5.00% | -0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.51% | 10.01% | +4.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.25% | 12.06% | +7.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.20% | 11.35% | +15.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.20% | 12.19% | +15.01% |
E61Z.DE vs. XDWS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
E61Z.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XDWS.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
E61Z.DE vs. XDWS.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither E61Z.DE nor XDWS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
E61Z.DE and XDWS.DE have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDWS.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDWS.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for E61Z.DE.
E61Z.DE tracks Solactive E-commerce, while XDWS.DE tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for E61Z.DE and 0.25% for XDWS.DE.
Find the right allocation for E61Z.DE and XDWS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer