XB0T.DE vs. IQQH.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (XB0T.DE) and iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQH.DE).
XB0T.DE and IQQH.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XB0T.DE is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic. It was launched on Nov 16, 2021. IQQH.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Clean Energy. It was launched on Jul 9, 2007. Both XB0T.DE and IQQH.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XB0T.DE or IQQH.DE.
Correlation
The correlation between XB0T.DE and IQQH.DE is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
XB0T.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
XB0T.DE:
1.00
IQQH.DE:
-0.89
XB0T.DE:
1.42
IQQH.DE:
-1.18
XB0T.DE:
1.19
IQQH.DE:
0.86
XB0T.DE:
0.60
IQQH.DE:
-0.29
XB0T.DE:
4.11
IQQH.DE:
-1.51
XB0T.DE:
4.81%
IQQH.DE:
11.45%
XB0T.DE:
19.81%
IQQH.DE:
19.74%
XB0T.DE:
-51.53%
IQQH.DE:
-86.09%
XB0T.DE:
-12.89%
IQQH.DE:
-58.44%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XB0T.DE achieves a 6.65% return, which is significantly higher than IQQH.DE's -1.94% return.
XB0T.DE
6.65%
0.02%
16.03%
16.60%
N/A
N/A
IQQH.DE
-1.94%
1.09%
-15.27%
-15.20%
-2.37%
3.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XB0T.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XB0T.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than IQQH.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XB0T.DE vs. IQQH.DE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
XB0T.DE
IQQH.DE
XB0T.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (XB0T.DE) and iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XB0T.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Dividend Comparison
XB0T.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IQQH.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XB0T.DE Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IQQH.DE iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.34% | 1.32% | 1.72% | 0.83% | 1.23% | 0.79% | 2.89% | 3.30% | 4.82% | 4.72% | 2.86% | 2.81% |
Drawdowns
XB0T.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XB0T.DE drawdown since its inception was -51.53%, smaller than the maximum IQQH.DE drawdown of -86.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XB0T.DE and IQQH.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XB0T.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Volatility Comparison
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (XB0T.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.33% compared to iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQH.DE) at 5.09%. This indicates that XB0T.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IQQH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.