E61Z.DE vs. 2B7D.DE
E61Z.DE (Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and 2B7D.DE (iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - E61Z.DE tracks the Solactive E-commerce while 2B7D.DE tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, E61Z.DE returned 14.61%/yr vs 5.47%/yr for 2B7D.DE. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. E61Z.DE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for 2B7D.DE.
Performance
E61Z.DE vs. 2B7D.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, E61Z.DE achieves a -14.62% return, which is significantly lower than 2B7D.DE's 7.60% return.
E61Z.DE
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- -0.83%
- YTD
- -14.62%
- 6M
- -14.70%
- 1Y
- -10.48%
- 3Y*
- 14.61%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
2B7D.DE
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -1.79%
- YTD
- 7.60%
- 6M
- 6.06%
- 1Y
- 2.02%
- 3Y*
- 5.47%
- 5Y*
- 7.77%
- 10Y*
- —
E61Z.DE vs. 2B7D.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E61Z.DE Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | -14.62% | 7.18% | 37.44% | 27.85% | -36.99% | -14.47% |
2B7D.DE iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF | 7.60% | -8.12% | 21.83% | -3.82% | 5.50% | 7.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between E61Z.DE and 2B7D.DE is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2021 | 0.10 |
The correlation between E61Z.DE and 2B7D.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
E61Z.DE vs. 2B7D.DE — Risk / Return Rank
E61Z.DE
2B7D.DE
E61Z.DE vs. 2B7D.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (E61Z.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (2B7D.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| E61Z.DE | 2B7D.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.04 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.38 | 0.03 | -0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.76 | 0.05 | -0.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| E61Z.DE | 2B7D.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.50 | 0.02 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.11 | 0.35 | -0.46 |
Drawdowns
E61Z.DE vs. 2B7D.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum E61Z.DE drawdown since its inception was -49.16%, which is greater than 2B7D.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for E61Z.DE and 2B7D.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| E61Z.DE | 2B7D.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.16% | -26.89% | -22.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.19% | -16.85% | -8.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.13% | -16.85% | -13.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.27% | -9.21% | -12.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.70% | -8.47% | -17.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.75% | 8.88% | +3.87% |
Volatility
E61Z.DE vs. 2B7D.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (E61Z.DE) is 4.55%, while iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (2B7D.DE) has a volatility of 6.09%. This indicates that E61Z.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 2B7D.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| E61Z.DE | 2B7D.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.55% | 6.09% | -1.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.51% | 11.56% | +2.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.25% | 25.70% | -6.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.20% | 16.48% | +10.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.20% | 16.93% | +10.27% |
E61Z.DE vs. 2B7D.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
E61Z.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than 2B7D.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
E61Z.DE vs. 2B7D.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither E61Z.DE nor 2B7D.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
E61Z.DE and 2B7D.DE have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 2B7D.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
2B7D.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for E61Z.DE.
E61Z.DE tracks Solactive E-commerce, while 2B7D.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for E61Z.DE and 0.15% for 2B7D.DE.
Find the right allocation for E61Z.DE and 2B7D.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer