2B7D.DE vs. VFV.TO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (2B7D.DE) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO).

2B7D.DE and VFV.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. 2B7D.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples. It was launched on Mar 20, 2017. VFV.TO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2012. Both 2B7D.DE and VFV.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

2B7D.DE vs. VFV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (2B7D.DE) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

2B7D.DE vs. VFV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
2B7D.DE iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF	7.51%	-8.12%	21.83%	-3.82%	5.50%	28.07%	-0.37%	32.49%	-6.43%	-11.68%
VFV.TO Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF	-2.27%	3.61%	32.77%	22.26%	-13.38%	38.06%	8.21%	34.36%	-0.59%	3.66%

Different Trading Currencies

2B7D.DE is traded in EUR, while VFV.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the VFV.TO values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2B7D.DE achieves a 7.51% return, which is significantly higher than VFV.TO's -2.27% return.

2B7D.DE

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: -6.48%
• YTD: 7.51%
• 6M: 8.36%
• 1Y: -2.37%
• 3Y*: 5.53%
• 5Y*: 8.19%
• 10Y*: —

VFV.TO

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: -3.36%
• YTD: -2.27%
• 6M: -0.22%
• 1Y: 9.90%
• 3Y*: 15.73%
• 5Y*: 12.01%
• 10Y*: 13.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2B7D.DE vs. VFV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

2B7D.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VFV.TO's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

2B7D.DE

iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF

VFV.TO

Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF

Return for Risk

2B7D.DE vs. VFV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2B7D.DE

2B7D.DE Risk / Return Rank: 10
2B7D.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
2B7D.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
2B7D.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 10
2B7D.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
2B7D.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 10

VFV.TO

VFV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 43
VFV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
VFV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
VFV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 46
VFV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
VFV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2B7D.DE vs. VFV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (2B7D.DE) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	2B7D.DE	VFV.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.09	0.48	-0.57
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.05	0.79	-0.74
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.13	-0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.12	0.73	-0.85
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.23	3.05	-3.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

2B7D.DE vs. VFV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2B7D.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is lower than the VFV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2B7D.DE and VFV.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	2B7D.DE	VFV.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09	0.48	-0.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	0.72	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.72	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.81	-0.45

Correlation

The correlation between 2B7D.DE and VFV.TO is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

2B7D.DE vs. VFV.TO - Dividend Comparison

2B7D.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VFV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
2B7D.DE iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VFV.TO Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF	0.96%	0.92%	0.99%	1.20%	1.31%	1.06%	1.33%	1.55%	1.68%	1.50%	1.66%	1.63%

Drawdowns

2B7D.DE vs. VFV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2B7D.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.89%, smaller than the maximum VFV.TO drawdown of -33.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2B7D.DE and VFV.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	2B7D.DE	VFV.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.89%	-27.43%	+0.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.85%	-12.52%	-4.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.85%	-22.19%	+5.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-27.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.29%	-5.61%	-3.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.48%	-3.39%	-5.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.90%	3.31%	+5.59%

Volatility

2B7D.DE vs. VFV.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (2B7D.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO) at 4.36%. This indicates that 2B7D.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	2B7D.DE	VFV.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.72%	4.36%	+0.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.87%	9.51%	+14.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.89%	20.71%	+5.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.27%	16.77%	-0.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.91%	18.86%	-1.95%