DZZ vs. COPZ
DZZ (DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes) and COPZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long Copper ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DZZ is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold (-200%), while COPZ is a Copper fund actively managed by Defiance. DZZ is passively managed, while COPZ is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.40, they often move in opposite directions. DZZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for COPZ.
Performance
DZZ vs. COPZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DZZ
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -12.68%
- YTD
- -52.47%
- 6M
- -48.59%
- 1Y
- -5.68%
- 3Y*
- -10.43%
- 5Y*
- -8.56%
- 10Y*
- -10.01%
COPZ
- 1D
- -12.01%
- 1M
- -13.49%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DZZ vs. COPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DZZ DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes | -32.66% |
COPZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Long Copper ETF | -28.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between DZZ and COPZ is -0.40, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2026 | -0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DZZ vs. COPZ — Risk / Return Rank
DZZ
COPZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DZZ vs. COPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long Copper ETF (COPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DZZ | COPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.10 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DZZ vs. COPZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DZZ drawdown since its inception was -96.64%, which is greater than COPZ's maximum drawdown of -49.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DZZ and COPZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DZZ | COPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.64% | -49.79% | -46.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -81.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -81.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.55% | -41.30% | -54.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.32% | -28.87% | -53.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 56.22% | — | — |
Volatility
DZZ vs. COPZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DZZ | COPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.04% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.07% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 169.84% | 110.79% | +59.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.80% | 110.79% | -26.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.06% | 110.79% | -46.73% |
DZZ vs. COPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
DZZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than COPZ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
DZZ vs. COPZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither DZZ nor COPZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DZZ and COPZ have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DZZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DZZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for COPZ.
DZZ and COPZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
DZZ is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while COPZ is Copper. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DZZ and 0.95% for COPZ.
Find the right allocation for DZZ and COPZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer