DYNF vs. XME
DYNF (iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF) and XME (SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DYNF is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by iShares, while XME is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index. DYNF is actively managed, while XME is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DYNF returned 15.35%/yr vs 22.93%/yr for XME. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DYNF charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XME.
Performance
DYNF vs. XME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DYNF achieves a 12.25% return, which is significantly lower than XME's 16.50% return.
DYNF
- 1D
- 2.16%
- 1M
- 2.71%
- YTD
- 12.25%
- 6M
- 12.86%
- 1Y
- 31.46%
- 3Y*
- 25.36%
- 5Y*
- 15.35%
- 10Y*
- —
XME
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 4.36%
- YTD
- 16.50%
- 6M
- 19.83%
- 1Y
- 85.37%
- 3Y*
- 35.28%
- 5Y*
- 22.93%
- 10Y*
- 19.14%
DYNF vs. XME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | 12.25% | 20.00% | 30.29% | 36.25% | -20.27% | 22.12% | 13.47% | 14.75% |
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF | 16.50% | 83.47% | -4.54% | 21.51% | 13.13% | 34.92% | 15.95% | 0.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between DYNF and XME is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2019 | 0.60 |
The correlation between DYNF and XME has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
DYNF vs. XME - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DYNF
XME
Technology
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Technology
DYNF
XME
Financial Services
DYNF
XME
-
Communication Services
DYNF
XME
-
Industrials
DYNF
XME
Consumer Cyclical
DYNF
XME
-
Healthcare
DYNF
XME
-
Energy
DYNF
XME
Utilities
DYNF
XME
-
Real Estate
DYNF
XME
-
Consumer Defensive
DYNF
XME
Basic Materials
DYNF
XME
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DYNF vs. XME — Risk / Return Rank
DYNF
XME
DYNF vs. XME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DYNF | XME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.37 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.65 | 3.80 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.10 | 9.44 | +7.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DYNF vs. XME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DYNF drawdown since its inception was -34.72%, smaller than the maximum XME drawdown of -85.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DYNF and XME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DYNF | XME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.72% | -85.89% | +51.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.67% | -22.60% | +13.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.70% | -30.47% | +11.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.65% | -37.27% | +8.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -9.18% | +9.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.96% | -44.08% | +38.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 9.07% | -7.22% |
Volatility
DYNF vs. XME - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF) is 5.25%, while SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) has a volatility of 15.14%. This indicates that DYNF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DYNF | XME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.25% | 15.14% | -9.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.57% | 28.15% | -17.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.14% | 36.17% | -23.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.61% | 32.83% | -15.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.92% | 32.93% | -13.01% |
DYNF vs. XME - Expense Ratio Comparison
DYNF has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than XME's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
DYNF vs. XME - Dividend Comparison
DYNF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, more than XME's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | 1.06% | 1.01% | 0.65% | 1.11% | 1.66% | 2.89% | 1.52% | 1.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF | 0.32% | 0.38% | 0.65% | 1.00% | 1.64% | 0.70% | 0.99% | 2.43% | 2.23% | 1.15% | 1.02% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DYNF and XME have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XME has higher volatility (15.14%) compared to DYNF (5.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DYNF dropped -34.72% vs XME's -85.89%.
On 5-year performance, XME leads with 22.93% vs 15.35% for DYNF. On fees, DYNF is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, DYNF has been the lower-risk option at 5.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XME has performed better with a 22.93% return vs 15.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DYNF is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XME.
DYNF has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 0.32% for XME.
DYNF is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while XME is Materials. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for DYNF and 0.35% for XME.
DYNF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DYNF and XME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer