DYNF vs. WINN

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

DYNF (BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF) and WINN (Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DYNF returned 26.47%/yr vs 23.40%/yr for WINN. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DYNF charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for WINN.

Performance

DYNF vs. WINN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF) and Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DYNF achieves a 11.93% return, which is significantly higher than WINN's 7.28% return.

DYNF

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 5.19%
• YTD: 11.93%
• 6M: 11.85%
• 1Y: 30.76%
• 3Y*: 26.47%
• 5Y*: 15.11%
• 10Y*: —

WINN

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 4.97%
• YTD: 7.28%
• 6M: 5.80%
• 1Y: 19.61%
• 3Y*: 23.40%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DYNF vs. WINN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
DYNF BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF	11.93%	20.00%	30.29%	36.25%	-13.14%
WINN Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF	7.28%	14.31%	31.64%	52.44%	-26.67%

Correlation

The correlation between DYNF and WINN is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2022	0.93

The correlation between DYNF and WINN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

DYNF vs. WINN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DYNF	WINN
Technology	39.8%	49.2%
Financial Services	16.2%	5.1%
Communication Services	11.7%	15.9%
Industrials	8.4%	4.9%
Consumer Cyclical	7.8%	13.3%
Healthcare	6.6%	6.8%
Utilities	2.7%	1.4%
Consumer Defensive	2.4%	2.9%
Energy	1.9%	-
Real Estate	1.9%	0.4%
Basic Materials	0.7%	-

Return for Risk

DYNF vs. WINN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DYNF

DYNF Risk / Return Rank: 77
DYNF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
DYNF Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
DYNF Omega Ratio Rank: 75
DYNF Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
DYNF Martin Ratio Rank: 84

WINN

WINN Risk / Return Rank: 30
WINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
WINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
WINN Omega Ratio Rank: 34
WINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
WINN Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DYNF vs. WINN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF) and Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DYNF	WINN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.48	1.22	+1.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.37	1.73	+1.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.22	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.57	1.09	+2.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.29	3.40	+13.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DYNF vs. WINN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DYNF Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is higher than the WINN Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DYNF and WINN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DYNF	WINN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.48	1.22	+1.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.83	0.62	+0.21

Drawdowns

DYNF vs. WINN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DYNF drawdown since its inception was -34.72%, which is greater than WINN's maximum drawdown of -32.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DYNF and WINN.

Drawdown Indicators

	DYNF	WINN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.72%	-32.07%	-2.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.67%	-18.06%	+9.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.70%	-23.66%	+4.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.65%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	-1.88%	+1.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.97%	-9.08%	+3.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.78%	5.78%	-4.00%

Volatility

DYNF vs. WINN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF) is 3.21%, while Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) has a volatility of 4.01%. This indicates that DYNF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WINN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DYNF	WINN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.21%	4.01%	-0.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.55%	12.22%	-2.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.44%	16.12%	-3.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.49%	23.73%	-6.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.90%	23.73%	-3.83%

DYNF vs. WINN - Expense Ratio Comparison

DYNF has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than WINN's 0.57% expense ratio.

Dividends

DYNF vs. WINN - Dividend Comparison

DYNF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, while WINN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DYNF BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF	0.88%	1.01%	0.65%	1.11%	1.66%	2.89%	1.52%	1.22%
WINN Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.06%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DYNF and WINN in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, DYNF and WINN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DYNF or WINN?

WINN has higher volatility (4.01%) compared to DYNF (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DYNF dropped -34.72% vs WINN's -32.07%.

Which ETF is better, DYNF or WINN?

On 3-year performance, DYNF leads with 26.47% vs 23.40% for WINN. On fees, DYNF is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, DYNF has been the lower-risk option at 3.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DYNF or WINN?

Over the 3-year period, DYNF has performed better with a 26.47% return vs 23.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DYNF or WINN?

DYNF is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for WINN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DYNF or WINN?

DYNF has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.00% for WINN.

What is the main difference between DYNF and WINN?

They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for DYNF and 0.57% for WINN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DYNF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.