DYNF vs. HDMV
DYNF (BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF) and HDMV (First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DYNF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by BlackRock, while HDMV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DYNF returned 15.04%/yr vs 6.31%/yr for HDMV. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DYNF charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for HDMV.
Performance
DYNF vs. HDMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DYNF achieves a 11.55% return, which is significantly higher than HDMV's 4.23% return.
DYNF
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 5.74%
- YTD
- 11.55%
- 6M
- 11.74%
- 1Y
- 30.19%
- 3Y*
- 26.22%
- 5Y*
- 15.04%
- 10Y*
- —
HDMV
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- 4.23%
- 6M
- 5.97%
- 1Y
- 9.53%
- 3Y*
- 12.63%
- 5Y*
- 6.31%
- 10Y*
- —
DYNF vs. HDMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DYNF BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF | 11.55% | 20.00% | 30.29% | 36.25% | -20.27% | 22.12% | 13.47% | 14.07% |
HDMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF | 4.23% | 29.31% | 2.99% | 9.62% | -11.47% | 7.39% | -9.42% | 5.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between DYNF and HDMV is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2019 | 0.63 |
The correlation between DYNF and HDMV shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (3 years) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DYNF vs. HDMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DYNF
HDMV
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
DYNF
HDMV
Financial Services
DYNF
HDMV
Communication Services
DYNF
HDMV
Industrials
DYNF
HDMV
Consumer Cyclical
DYNF
HDMV
Healthcare
DYNF
HDMV
Utilities
DYNF
HDMV
Consumer Defensive
DYNF
HDMV
Energy
DYNF
HDMV
Real Estate
DYNF
HDMV
Basic Materials
DYNF
HDMV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DYNF vs. HDMV — Risk / Return Rank
DYNF
HDMV
DYNF vs. HDMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF) and First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DYNF | HDMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.16 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.50 | 1.10 | +2.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.97 | 3.41 | +13.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DYNF | HDMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.44 | 0.86 | +1.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.53 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.40 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
DYNF vs. HDMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DYNF drawdown since its inception was -34.72%, which is greater than HDMV's maximum drawdown of -32.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DYNF and HDMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DYNF | HDMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.72% | -32.01% | -2.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.67% | -8.73% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.70% | -10.33% | -8.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.65% | -24.11% | -4.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.57% | -6.05% | +5.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.98% | -6.77% | +0.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 2.80% | -1.02% |
Volatility
DYNF vs. HDMV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF) is 3.27%, while First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) has a volatility of 3.83%. This indicates that DYNF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HDMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DYNF | HDMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.27% | 3.83% | -0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.55% | 9.38% | +0.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.44% | 11.16% | +1.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.50% | 12.05% | +5.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.90% | 13.24% | +6.66% |
DYNF vs. HDMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DYNF has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than HDMV's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
DYNF vs. HDMV - Dividend Comparison
DYNF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than HDMV's 4.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DYNF BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF | 0.89% | 1.01% | 0.65% | 1.11% | 1.66% | 2.89% | 1.52% | 1.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HDMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF | 4.70% | 5.09% | 3.24% | 3.14% | 3.53% | 3.11% | 1.45% | 3.63% | 2.88% | 3.23% | 0.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DYNF and HDMV have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HDMV has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to DYNF (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DYNF dropped -34.72% vs HDMV's -32.01%.
On 5-year performance, DYNF leads with 15.04% vs 6.31% for HDMV. On fees, DYNF is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, DYNF has been the lower-risk option at 3.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DYNF has performed better with a 15.04% return vs 6.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DYNF is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for HDMV.
HDMV has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 0.89% for DYNF.
DYNF is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while HDMV is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for DYNF and 0.80% for HDMV.
DYNF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DYNF and HDMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer