DYNF vs. FDRR

Last updated Jun 21, 2026

DYNF (iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF) and FDRR (Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. DYNF is actively managed, while FDRR is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DYNF returned 15.75%/yr vs 12.70%/yr for FDRR. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DYNF charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FDRR.

Performance

DYNF vs. FDRR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF) and Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DYNF achieves a 11.87% return, which is significantly higher than FDRR's 8.28% return.

DYNF

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: 2.01%
• YTD: 11.87%
• 6M: 11.96%
• 1Y: 30.88%
• 3Y*: 25.22%
• 5Y*: 15.75%
• 10Y*: —

FDRR

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 0.99%
• YTD: 8.28%
• 6M: 9.17%
• 1Y: 28.05%
• 3Y*: 19.29%
• 5Y*: 12.70%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DYNF vs. FDRR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF	11.87%	20.00%	30.29%	36.25%	-20.27%	22.12%	13.47%	14.75%
FDRR Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates	8.28%	21.70%	20.24%	13.66%	-9.73%	26.06%	8.23%	14.38%

Correlation

The correlation between DYNF and FDRR is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2019	0.91

The correlation between DYNF and FDRR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

DYNF vs. FDRR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DYNF	FDRR
Technology	40.5%	38.2%
Financial Services	14.9%	11.3%
Communication Services	10.3%	10.1%
Industrials	9.5%	8.3%
Consumer Cyclical	7.0%	8.2%
Healthcare	5.8%	9.3%
Energy	4.5%	3.2%
Utilities	2.8%	2.1%
Real Estate	1.9%	2.8%
Consumer Defensive	1.7%	4.5%
Basic Materials	0.8%	2.0%

Return for Risk

DYNF vs. FDRR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DYNF

DYNF Risk / Return Rank: 78
DYNF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
DYNF Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
DYNF Omega Ratio Rank: 76
DYNF Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
DYNF Martin Ratio Rank: 85

FDRR

FDRR Risk / Return Rank: 78
FDRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
FDRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FDRR Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FDRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
FDRR Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DYNF vs. FDRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF) and Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DYNF	FDRR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.34	2.49	-0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.15	3.46	-0.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.45	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.55	3.29	+0.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.64	13.59	+3.05

DYNF vs. FDRR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DYNF Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the FDRR Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DYNF and FDRR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DYNF vs. FDRR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DYNF drawdown since its inception was -34.72%, roughly equal to the maximum FDRR drawdown of -36.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DYNF and FDRR.

Drawdown Indicators

	DYNF	FDRR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.72%	-36.52%	+1.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.67%	-8.52%	-0.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.70%	-18.04%	-0.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.65%	-20.92%	-7.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.34%	-2.71%	+2.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.95%	-4.00%	-1.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.85%	2.06%	-0.21%

Volatility

DYNF vs. FDRR - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF) has a higher volatility of 5.18% compared to Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) at 3.82%. This indicates that DYNF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDRR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DYNF	FDRR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.18%	3.82%	+1.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.60%	8.73%	+1.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.13%	11.24%	+1.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.60%	15.03%	+2.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.92%	16.86%	+3.06%

DYNF vs. FDRR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DYNF has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than FDRR's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

DYNF vs. FDRR - Dividend Comparison

DYNF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than FDRR's 2.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF	0.80%	1.01%	0.65%	1.11%	1.66%	2.89%	1.52%	1.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FDRR Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates	2.16%	2.21%	2.61%	2.93%	2.75%	2.09%	2.85%	2.89%	3.20%	2.89%	0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DYNF and FDRR in my portfolio?

DYNF and FDRR have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DYNF or FDRR?

DYNF has higher volatility (5.18%) compared to FDRR (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DYNF dropped -34.72% vs FDRR's -36.52%.

Which ETF is better, DYNF or FDRR?

On 5-year performance, DYNF leads with 15.75% vs 12.70% for FDRR. On fees, FDRR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FDRR has been the lower-risk option at 3.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DYNF or FDRR?

Over the 5-year period, DYNF has performed better with a 15.75% return vs 12.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DYNF or FDRR?

FDRR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for DYNF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DYNF or FDRR?

FDRR has the higher dividend yield at 2.16%, compared with 0.80% for DYNF.

What is the main difference between DYNF and FDRR?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for DYNF and 0.15% for FDRR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.